[OutlawJoseyWales]

I stick by my comment. Oldham had the best player and enough depth to compete with belfry. Belfry was the better team and it showed they won the ball game. If playing a series though they wouldn't sweep Oldham. Please don't misconstrue my words. I didn't say Oldham had more depth or more quality players, but they had athletes at all the skill positions. Belfry definitely had the upper hand at the LOS. Keaton Martin was the best player on the field. That's an unbiased opinion, more like fact. But, belfry had guy's like Hensley, Bentley, Cook, Burchfield, Stepp, Fields, Etc... Although Belfry had more first tier guy's Oldhams second tier guy's can play at a very high level. Bednarczyk, Downing, Love, Chester, Lalli, etc. we're very solid players. I don't care if you like my opinion or not, but I guarantee I watch more middle school football and I know how to evaluate talent. Belfry was the better team, but the gap wasn't by much.

Now who has sour grapes?? I certainly wasn't dismissive of Oldham (your team). Just stating my opinion that the game was woefully officiated. My opinion will not change in that regard. The Martin kid is definitely a nice player. However, from my vantage point....right up to the point that he got hurt....Jacob Baisden appeared to be the best player on the field.

Just as unbiased as your take.