[TheRealVille]

The same question could be, and has been, asked of you and you declined to answer. Does you conscience not bother you at all when you ridicule other people's religion, calling the basis of their beliefs fairly tales, while you also claim to believe in a god but refuse to offer any evidence of his existence?

Religion is a matter of faith. If you understood more about theoretical physics, you would realize that the overwhelming number people who accept the big bang theory do so as a matter of faith because their is no proof of its veracity and the mathematics that underpins the theory is beyond the grasp of nearly everybody on the planet.

If you are going to demand proof of the existence of God, as Christians know Him, then hold yourself to that same lofty evidentiary standard. If you try to do that (an impossibility by definition), then you maybe it will dawn on you how unreasonable you are being in these circuitous religious debates.

I don't understand why you keep interjecting religion and gay rights into so many debates where they do not even fit. You just end up insulting Christians and drawing attention to the double standard that you hold yourself to when it comes to your own beliefs.

I'm not ridiculing. I don't believe in his book. If he wants to quote scripture as his proof of a christian god, it won't fly with me. Is me not believing in a christian god, and asking for proof when someone quotes scripture, and says I will burn, ridiculing their belief? When he preaches to me, and quotes scripture that damns me to his god's hell, I have every right to demand proof that his god exists. I don't have to offer proof on my god, I don't push him in peoples' face, and don't care whether they believe in him or not. Are you now the self appointed god cop?