South Floyd VS Allen Central 12/19

Raider_Nation09 · 12-15-2008, 10:58 PM

thoughts and predictions

jolly rancher · 12-15-2008, 11:01 PM

Without the crowders im going to take the raiders by 10

Basketballer · 12-15-2008, 11:03 PM

jolly rancher Wrote:Without the crowders im going to take the raiders by 10

Why are they not playing?

**BlackcatAlum** · 12-15-2008, 11:03 PM

I still think that this will be a good game even without the Crowder's. Allen Central still has some pretty good players in Jackson, Jarrell and Stumbo, but I do expect the Raiders to pick a big district victory.

Best of luck to both!

blackcat_mvp6 · 12-15-2008, 11:04 PM

Should be a good one actually. Raiders by 4.

jolly rancher · 12-15-2008, 11:04 PM

Basketballer Wrote:Why are they not playing?

there are posts on this site about it....they apparently are not playing anymore.

pburgcatfan65 · 12-15-2008, 11:04 PM

Basketballer Wrote:Why are they not playing?

In a thread we have already started they have been let off the team and im going to take south floyd by 5+

**BlackcatAlum** · 12-15-2008, 11:04 PM

Basketballer Wrote:Why are they not playing?

http://www.bluegrassrivals.com/forum/sho...hp?t=50768

Raider_Nation09 · 12-15-2008, 11:04 PM

Basketballer Wrote:Why are they not playing?

they either quit or got dismissed.

**The Sniper** · 12-15-2008, 11:06 PM

I like the Raiders with or without the Crowders. Personally I hope they play because I know SF wants nothing but AC's "A" game when they play.

blackcat_mvp6 · 12-15-2008, 11:07 PM

They don't want them out there cause they would lose.

Officer.Farva · 12-15-2008, 11:17 PM

I'm taken SF in this one without the Crowder twins AC doesn't have much going for them.So in this one SF by 6+

Bleacher_Creature_10 · 12-15-2008, 11:22 PM

SF by 5+.

Junk Yard Dog · 12-15-2008, 11:52 PM

I like SF by 10

TRUBLX3 · 12-16-2008, 09:36 AM

This may be one of the worst games to watch this year, flip a coin, 50 points should win this one.

Creeker · 12-16-2008, 11:59 AM

SF by 10+

runninrebs21 · 12-16-2008, 06:28 PM

TRUBLX3 Wrote:This may be one of the worst games to watch this year, flip a coin, 50 points should win this one.

I agree. Without the twins, this is a battle between the worst 2 teams in the region and personally i think now, south floyd will win by 5-10 pts. About SF wanting their "A" game, i doubt that. They want to play the team they can beat. With Hunter and Logan, AC would win by 15-20. And don't start on that stuff about the "tenacious" defenders could shut the twins down cause everyone on here knows thats a lie. But anyways, i am going to take SF by 8

SF 52
AC 44

**outdoorsman43** · 12-16-2008, 06:53 PM

I would take the Rebels if they had the Crowders. Since they don't I'm picking the Raiders by 10+.

the old WASP · 12-16-2008, 06:58 PM

Because that person they call a coach ,said they don't try so he kicked them of the team. The truth is he can't coach so if he gets rid of the good players . He can say I don't any players . Its called trying to cover your behind

the old WASP · 12-16-2008, 07:04 PM

Funny......... Lol

runninrebs21 · 12-16-2008, 07:24 PM

lol thats funny

EKY_Soccer_Fanatic · 12-16-2008, 11:48 PM

I believe good ole' SF will take this now.
Goodluck to both teams though.

brain cramp · 12-16-2008, 11:58 PM

runninrebs21 Wrote:I agree. Without the twins, this is a battle between the worst 2 teams in the region and personally i think now, south floyd will win by 5-10 pts. About SF wanting their "A" game, i doubt that. They want to play the team they can beat. With Hunter and Logan, AC would win by 15-20. And don't start on that stuff about the "tenacious" defenders could shut the twins down cause everyone on here knows thats a lie. But anyways, i am going to take SF by 8

SF 52
AC 44

I can see how you say that. After all, they never lost a game the crowders played in this year did they. Not having them on the team is a travesty, but dont kid yourself that they were going to have a great game or great season with them. The kids are the ones who suffer the mistakes of adults. If the administration had not felt power hungry and jealous of the old coaching staff, this team would have three solid starters, now they have none.

runninrebs21 · 12-17-2008, 12:00 AM

I never said they would have a good season, but they were a better team than south floyd by a longshot with prater and the twins. Thats all i was saying. Now that all 3 of them gone, they wont win 1 game IMO. But i agree with you that the players suffer now.

brain cramp · 12-17-2008, 12:31 AM

runninrebs21 Wrote:I never said they would have a good season, but they were a better team than south floyd by a longshot with prater and the twins. Thats all i was saying. Now that all 3 of them gone, they wont win 1 game IMO. But i agree with you that the players suffer now.

Now we are on the same page. The loss of the three is what killed this team. I did not mean to make it sound like the twins are not good players, but they were not going to turn into guards. They needed some one to help get them the ball play some defense out front. They were not going to be good, now they are flat out horrible. This game is at south floyd and I dont see it being less than a double digit loss. Adults holding a grudge and trying to tell the world who is in charge brought all of this on. I have, like many on this site seen these boys play for awhile now, they do not have the kind of personality to be pawns in a power struggle. Good kids, but they appear to be pretty stubborn and not the type to be pushed to hard before they push back. I hope them and Prater the best and wish for a quick end to what will probably be the worst season that AC basketball has ever had.

What is the worst record their school has ever had in basketball anyway? That record might be in jeopardy.

runninrebs21 · 12-17-2008, 12:35 AM

Oh it is in jeopardy definitely.. I agree they needed guards to begin with, but now they need a whole starting 5. With hunter and logan and prater, that is enough to win a few games and keep a lot close, but now, there is no one to handle the ball, pass, shoot anything. I dont know how they put 36 up on JC tonight to be honest

brain cramp · 12-17-2008, 12:42 AM

runninrebs21 Wrote:Oh it is in jeopardy definitely.. I agree they needed guards to begin with, but now they need a whole starting 5. With hunter and logan and prater, that is enough to win a few games and keep a lot close, but now, there is no one to handle the ball, pass, shoot anything. I dont know how they put 36 up on JC tonight to be honest

ditto

JackFrost · 12-17-2008, 12:57 AM

Sf-75
Ac-60

The Chosen One · 12-17-2008, 01:07 AM

ill take sf in this one 62-51 sf's big men will def be happy to play ac without the crowder twins to beat and bang them around

**The Sniper** · 12-17-2008, 01:19 AM

runninrebs21 Wrote:I agree. Without the twins, this is a battle between the worst 2 teams in the region and personally i think now, south floyd will win by 5-10 pts. About SF wanting their "A" game, i doubt that. They want to play the team they can beat. With Hunter and Logan, AC would win by 15-20. And don't start on that stuff about the "tenacious" defenders could shut the twins down cause everyone on here knows thats a lie. But anyways, i am going to take SF by 8

SF 52
AC 44

Both should always want each others best ! Wink