[the_game]

??? any opinions imo burnett little from sf followed by his partner in crime steven stanley and then far behind brandon kidd from bl

[South_21]

If Steve Stanley could get up and down the floor and get a rebound he might be good. He's the biggest man in the region and wont move!!! Burnett Little is the best!!! Steve is like 3rd!

[dontdoattoem]

Little and Stanley! I'd take either of them, Barry Hall has the luxury of having both of them on the same team!

[big man in the 15th]

little and stanley are by far the best post player in the region it is not right for them to be on the same team it is such A advange for sf and they are relizing that now and the outside shooting as picked up for them they will be tough come march and well winn the 58th and the 15th this year stanley and little are to much for teams u cant stop them both ther is no way one of them will always have a good game u cant gaurd them both

[the_game]

big man in the 15th
i said whos the best not best duo whose better between the 2

[South_21]

Burnett Little is defently the better of the two. He can shoot, rebound, and he hustles.

[sf_fan2]

yea from what ive seen of stanley he is lazy if he had a work ethic he might be close to number 1 but the way i rank it is
1bubby little-----------way down here 2 steve stanley ----------- then 3 jamie priest

[sf_fan2]

[quote=""sf_fan2""]yea from what ive seen of stanley he is lazy if he had a work ethic he might be close to number 1 but the way i rank it is
1bubby little-----------way down here 2 steve stanley ----------- then 3 tie between caffins and kid

[sf_fan2]

[quote=""sf_fan2""]yea from what ive seen of stanley he is lazy if he had a work ethic he might be close to number 1 but the way i rank it is
1bubby little-----------way down here 2 steve stanley ----------- then 3 tie between caffins and kidd

[sf_fan2]

from what ive seen of stanley he is lazy and has no work ethic
1 bubby little --------------2 way down here stanley --------3 tie between kidd and chaffins

[Wyatt Earp]

Little and Stanley can't play in the creek.

[BCF4L]

This has turned into a SF forum hasn't it? First I would take Little, then Chaffin, then John Mark Stephens from Prestonsburg.

[T-Balls]

Little and Stanley can't play in the creek.

name one team in the 15th that have or can stop either of them...and just for the record the are clean and have no desire to play in the creek

[big man in the 15th]

yea from what ive seen of stanley he is lazy if he had a work ethic he might be close to number 1 but the way i rank it is
1bubby little-----------way down here 2 steve stanley ----------- then 3 jamie priest

BUBBY is not that much better then evry one else,,,little and stanley are about the same in talent..little rebounds a lil better,,,,, and stanley scores a lil better so there no gap from A to B......And u must not even get to play for your team cause u dont know nothing about it

[Showtyme]

1. Little- SF
2. Chaffins- Pburg
3. Stephens- Pburg
4. Kidd- BL
5. Stanley- SF

The kid from AC could be good but no one to help, D just collapses on him.

[web-foot woe]

I would put Stanley and Little both at #1 because they feed off of each other very well and one would not be as good as they are without the other on the floor.
2. kidd Bl does not get enough touchs to see his true potential.
3. Chaffins for some reason he is not having the season I hoped he would.
4. Tim Griffth ac disappears during games/ but can score and rebound.
5. john Mark--good rebounder but has trouble against bigger players.

As far as south_21 and sf_fan2 have no right about talking about kids being lazy, I know south_21 could not make in threw one boys practice and lazy or not he is hard to handle down low works really hard and has played in a state tournament. For what you have seen sffan_2 he is lazy you need to watch more closely yes he may not run as fast as everyone else but the work he does once down the court is hard to deal with.

Both players are hard to handlle and need each other to be successful!

[South_21]

Its so nice of you William Booney to support the Raiders but as far as I go leave me out of it. I was joking with Stanley and he was beside me when I posted that about him. If you have some problem with me pm me and let me confront you face to face about your "feelings". You obvisously have a problem with me because you have dogged me many times. I may not be as quote "talented" as Stanley but at least I don't have the igo of a NBA player >No offense to Stanley, again he's here with me. Well, I've said my piece, on with the thread.


Bubby Little and Steve Stanley are the best big men with out a doubt. Both are very "talented" players. :wink:

[x-factor]

1.Little and Stanley SF
2.Kidd BL
3.Chaffins P-burg

[raider_balla]

wat about the big man from south floyd that is in the 8th grade. he is 6'8'' and in the 8th grade. he will dominate when he gets in high skl. he will probably b over 7 ft tall by the time he gets a senior.

[Raider]

Little and Stanley can't play in the creek.

If they can't play in the creek then i'd hate to see were you play at :lol: :twisted:

[blackcat]

Right now Stephens is the best, tonight he had 22 points, 18 rebounds, around 5 assists, and a couple blocked shots.

[bevinsville_bomber]

Some of you need to learn how to type.

[Basketballer]

I think that this has run its course..

[15thRegionCrazy]

John Mark Stephens played great tonight.. he is forsure one of the top in the 58th district and the 15th region