[Granny Bear]

Ok…. Either I’m just missing something, or this game has just confused me something awful. So someone explain to me dummy terms.

Are the results of these two teams this year based on injuries? Or….

Is KC horrible?

You had a HC team that lost to Whitley by 3 scores. Then turns around and lays it to KC. Then you have a KC team beat bell, but then get slaughtered by Harlan?  So either, bell/KC aren’t good at all, Harlan being a step above them, and Whitley on top?

I just remembered reading that KC would give the hounds an interesting match but after this result, and KC’s opponents opponents result, It would lead one to
Think something completely opposite.  I don’t follow these teams close enough to look at an injury status, HC vs WC might have made some difference, it being a 20 point game, but his one, nope.

God love it!  Let Granny explain:

Two of our best players went out early in Hazard game.  Injuries that they could not return to that game.  The more Hazard scored, the lower our confidence fell.  Then Whitley County played, and only one of those players played; and not for very long.  It was a game of two halves, and the second half, we just didn't show up.

Now everyone, including me, expected Knox Central to do better than they did.  It is my understanding that KC had three starters out.  I'm not sure why; probably injuries.  I THINK that they're expectations were very high and they may have even looked past HC.  But HC was hungry and wound up.  We scored early, and I was told that KC was knocked back on their heels a little.  The second score by HC took it's toll on the team confidence, too.  KC could just never recover enough to win the game.

Now I wasn't there.  That assessment is from a good friend of mine that does the radio commentary.