[Hound05]

I’m not choosing sides but granny bear has been reliable with all of her information since I’ve been on here. Which is a while. But this is fairly easy to resolve if anyone wants to look at the KHSAA rule book on this matter. It’s under the inclement weather subsection. If ONE coach wanted to play and the other didn’t, then it’s a forfeiture. Now if both agree, it is up to both schools to determine how to proceed, with a reschedule, and that has to happen with in a certain time frame. It goes on to say if an agreement can’t be met a bunch of other stuff and blah blah blah. But my point being- I’m not saying anyone is lying or anything like that either- if HC didn’t want to play or reschedule, then they would have taken a forfeiture For the game. Which they didn’t.

Bylaw 22 Section 7A also goes along with this as well. If a school, such as HC, failed to honor the contract and play the contest, they would have to forfeit that contest, to the offended school, Tate’s creek.

As far as I know, HC didn’t forfeit, so statement about their HC not wanting to play simply can’t be true unless both parties agreed on it