[WideRight05]

For which point, I was admittedly a little reluctant to post about the matter in the first place. And yet, when those who do know the truth, sit idly by and allow the white wash to continue unabated, those who are not old enough to remember the truth are being done a tremendous disservice. At any rate, mine is not to judge.

In my mind, one needs to ask himself how brutal the constraints imposed by Great Britain could possibly have been? The English people are a fair people. I believe that in general, the racial awakening which swept America during and after the Civil War era of the early 1860's, was also sweeping the rest of the world, including the British Empire. Therefore, in this one case men actually did aspire to more noble heights through their actions and their words. Great Britain came in after a time of war in South Africa and rebuilt that nation. Were some of those folks taken advantage of? No doubt. But, were the Brits ruthless overlords or, did their presence do good for the vast majority?

Now, with regard to Nelson Mandela. Being a Communist which, he was, is somewhat more of a problem for his saintly legacy than being a socialist. Ronald Reagan and Margaret Thatcher put Mandela on their country's list of terrorists. No small thing in and of itself. And, if you read the article for which I provided the link above, you saw that Mandela forces were responsible for the murder of "countless" blacks. EXCERPT--- "Mandela’s ANC and its South African Communist Party partners were widely viewed as ruthless communist terrorists. Considering their murderous activities, which included the barbaric executions and torture of countless South African blacks who opposed them, it is easy to understand why."

To me, the accolades being offered up, seem more uniquely applicable to Mahatma Gandhi, a true man of peace, than they would be to Nelson Mandela. Bottom line, real history has already recorded the story of man to date, including Nelson Mandela. Therefore, let's let history tell the true story, not accept the alternative view offered by overzealous liberal media, who are rewriting history across the board to suit their own palate.

That's one thing I have noticed, TRT, is how liberals tend to re-write history if there is something that differs from their philosophical beliefs. For example, I know someone who saw a really old history book one time. It had several references to God that would not be shown in a history book in this time period. Liberalism is like a cancer in our society, and its roots bear strongly in the public school system.