Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Russell 69 Greenup County 59
#11
HD28 Wrote:To me that's the key...they are a matchup problem for Russell with their length. Like I said earlier, they were 0-6 in the district so I do not believe they were second best in the district.

That length plus you left out the improved gaurd play with a healthy Bond back. Earlier in the year they were terrible. With everybody back they were much much better. IMO better than Raceland or Lewis.

It is moot because they are done now.
Messages In This Thread
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by GOREDDEVILS - 02-18-2013, 10:17 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by FBALL - 02-18-2013, 10:36 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by Creeker - 02-18-2013, 11:00 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by DevilWatcher - 02-19-2013, 12:56 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by HD28 - 02-19-2013, 10:03 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by Fred Sanford - 02-19-2013, 10:36 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by FBALL - 02-19-2013, 11:25 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by HD28 - 02-19-2013, 11:29 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by Fred Sanford - 02-19-2013, 11:29 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by HD28 - 02-19-2013, 11:30 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by FBALL - 02-19-2013, 11:53 AM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by Fred Sanford - 02-19-2013, 12:06 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by FBALL - 02-19-2013, 12:16 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by FBALL - 02-19-2013, 12:16 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by HD28 - 02-19-2013, 01:36 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by HD28 - 02-19-2013, 01:38 PM
Russell 69 Greenup County 59 - by FBALL - 02-19-2013, 02:17 PM

Forum Jump:

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)