12-17-2008, 01:32 AM
The Sniper Wrote:Both should always want each others best !
I agree with the Sniper. There is no excuses when both are at their best.
12-17-2008, 01:53 AM
Not saying SF is top 5 in the region or anything, but they are better than what people think. I mean really take a peak at their schedule, yeah they shouldve beat Cordia, but sometimes you just dont play as good as expected. Anyone, in this district would have the same record or may have beat Cordia, but out of 6 games 1 has been at home and that was Riverside. Johnson Central(2nd in 15th), Knott C.(2nd or maybe 1st in 14th), and Hazard(1st or 2nd in the 14th, all of which were away and very early in the season. I mean i may be crazy or not look at it the same as others, but SF has played one of the toughest, if not the toughest schedule in the region, besides Valley.
With that said...Some may laugh or say I'm crazy.
SF- 84
AC- 46
With that said...Some may laugh or say I'm crazy.
SF- 84
AC- 46
12-17-2008, 01:56 AM
uhavenoidea Wrote:Not saying SF is top 5 in the region or anything, but they are better than what people think. I mean really take a peak at their schedule, yeah they shouldve beat Cordia, but sometimes you just dont play as good as expected. Anyone, in this district would have the same record or may have beat Cordia, but out of 6 games 1 has been at home and that was Riverside. Johnson Central(2nd in 15th), Knott C.(2nd or maybe 1st in 14th), and Hazard(1st or 2nd in the 14th, all of which were away and very early in the season. I mean i may be crazy or not look at it the same as others, but SF has played one of the toughest, if not the toughest schedule in the region, besides Valley.
With that said...Some may laugh or say I'm crazy.
SF- 84
AC- 46
your probably right about this score i hope its the case anyway.
Its funny when south floyd was at thier peak in the early part of the 2000's i really hated them now i find myself wanting them to get back up there and i hope that in the next few years they will
12-17-2008, 02:06 AM
uhavenoidea Wrote:Not saying SF is top 5 in the region or anything, but they are better than what people think. I mean really take a peak at their schedule, yeah they shouldve beat Cordia, but sometimes you just dont play as good as expected. Anyone, in this district would have the same record or may have beat Cordia, but out of 6 games 1 has been at home and that was Riverside. Johnson Central(2nd in 15th), Knott C.(2nd or maybe 1st in 14th), and Hazard(1st or 2nd in the 14th, all of which were away and very early in the season. I mean i may be crazy or not look at it the same as others, but SF has played one of the toughest, if not the toughest schedule in the region, besides Valley.
With that said...Some may laugh or say I'm crazy.
SF- 84
AC- 46
I dont think it will quite be this bad, i dont think south floyd will put up 84, but ac will be lucky to put up 46
12-17-2008, 02:13 AM
I'll take the Raiders in this one by 6.
12-17-2008, 05:00 PM
i thnik that Raiders will win by 12
sf= 58
ac= 46
sf= 58
ac= 46
12-17-2008, 05:10 PM
SF by 5
12-17-2008, 08:44 PM
runninrebs21 Wrote:I agree. Without the twins, this is a battle between the worst 2 teams in the region and personally i think now, south floyd will win by 5-10 pts. About SF wanting their "A" game, i doubt that. They want to play the team they can beat. With Hunter and Logan, AC would win by 15-20. And don't start on that stuff about the "tenacious" defenders could shut the twins down cause everyone on here knows thats a lie. But anyways, i am going to take SF by 8wow when did these twins get so good they must have every college in the state looking at them lol ..........im going to teke sf in this one by 20 with or without who ever ac wants to bring im predicting a big game from shannon turner and tommy joe hall in this one... good luck raiders .....JC#14
SF 52
AC 44
12-17-2008, 11:03 PM
sf 10 or more
12-18-2008, 12:13 AM
wow could be the worst game of the year!!!!!!!
12-18-2008, 02:30 AM
The Sniper Wrote:I like the Raiders with or without the Crowders. Personally I hope they play because I know SF wants nothing but AC's "A" game when they play.
woah now....hh: let's not get hasty.....i think this will be a good game to watch....but with or with out the crowders?....do you know what you said?.....Even now the raiders couldn't handle the rebels "A" game.....unfortunately you probably won't see it......raiders by 4..
12-19-2008, 01:14 AM
i already predicted the score but now im goin to predict that turner drops 20 and tommy joe hall has atleast 15 good luck fellers
12-19-2008, 01:51 AM
Has Been Wrote:woah now....hh: let's not get hasty.....i think this will be a good game to watch....but with or with out the crowders?....do you know what you said?.....Even now the raiders couldn't handle the rebels "A" game.....unfortunately you probably won't see it......raiders by 4..
Oh, sorry about that!
12-19-2008, 02:24 PM
im gong to take ac in this one
AC -54
SF-50
AC -54
SF-50
12-19-2008, 06:10 PM
im definitely feelin the raiders in this one, they have been workin hard and one of thier players is back from ineligibility (#4 Matt Tackett), i dont know if he will play much but he is finally back
SF- 75
AC- 54
SF- 75
AC- 54
12-19-2008, 08:29 PM
Im gonna go with the raiders 46-35
Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)