Bluegrassrivals

This explains a lot. Maybe appointing a bunch of academics and career politicians to your cabinet to deal with a weak economy was not such a good idea after all.

Character counts and so does experience. Obama's administration comes up very short on both counts. Keep in mind that the chart below does not even include the idiots who Obama installed as "czars."

Quote:[INDENT]It isn't just the efforts to socialize medicine or nationalize the car industry or control banks or punish both consumers and industry for climate variations that have little to do with it either. It's every initiative that comes out of this White House.

We got another raft of them in last Wednesday's State of the Union address. Sure, there were good ideas here and there, and we made a point of highlighting them in this space Friday. But most of the others will do little to strengthen the country or the economy, and we're surprised the president's more experienced advisers allow them to be advanced.

But maybe that's the problem. Such advisers are few and far between in this White House. The chart below, which we've run before, shows that this crew has less real-world experience than any other administration since at least Teddy Roosevelt's.

Small wonder, then, that this White House is so anti-business, and that stocks have turned south. None of this gets by a market that is hypersensitive to such realities.

Link to full column

[Image: 2ISSb_100201.png][/INDENT]

Green as in uke:

Hey Hoot, your starting to remind me of Ross Perot. :biggrin:


Good stuff.