Bluegrassrivals

Final.

Congrats Pirates!

You'll get em' next time Hornets!


Congrats Pirates!

donathanhurley Wrote:You'll get em' next time Hornets!


Congrats Pirates!

reminds me, "i'll get you next time, gadget"

Congrats Blefry

Phelps 11 16 18 17 62

Belfry 16 19 13 18 66

Phelps (11-6) -- Stiltner 22, Hager 12, Smith 15, Campbell 9, Hobbs 4.
Belfry (6-10) -- Elkins 9, Hairston 11, Dotson 17, Maynard 15, Coleman 10, Varney 2, Pinson 2.

Nice win for Belfry. This score surprises me a little.

Congrats Belfry

Looks like the Pirates may be in the drivers seat for #1 seed.....

Let me correct my self Belfry only beat them by 4 and Phelp beat Belfry by 6, Only Pike Ct. could change things...

Yeah,
I'm not positive but if Phelps beats Pike Central they get first seed.
But not completely sure.

Yes, Belfry had to beat Phelps by more than 6.... SO... as of right now Phelps will hold the 1 seed if they beat Pike Central....

phs1986 Wrote:Yes, Belfry had to beat Phelps by more than 6.... SO... as of right now Phelps will hold the 1 seed if they beat Pike Central....

It is not always decided by point spread, sometimes it is decided by who wins the second game. It depends on what the district or region decides before the season. Two years ago, Belfry girls and Pike Central girls split with Belfry winning the first 62 - 49 and Pike Central winning the second 62 - 59, yet Pike Central got the #1 seed because they won the second game. With that being said, I do not know which way they decided this year.

ImagineThat! Wrote:It is not always decided by point spread, sometimes it is decided by who wins the second game. It depends on what the district or region decides before the season. Two years ago, Belfry girls and Pike Central girls split with Belfry winning the first 62 - 49 and Pike Central winning the second 62 - 59, yet Pike Central got the #1 seed because they won the second game. With that being said, I do not know which way they decided this year.

From what I understand it's points.... I heard several people on both sides saying that they had to beat Phelps by a score of 6+

phs1986 Wrote:From what I understand it's points.... I heard several people on both sides saying that they had to beat Phelps by a score of 6+

Thanks for the info, that's how it should be...the only down-fall is that it encourages running up the score, but it's still better than the other option.

3) The remaining two teams would play in the

[SIZE=1]

[SIZE=1]the district tournament with the loser of that game being

eliminated.
4) In the case of a two-way tie for the district winning position,
the winner in the second game played between the tied district

opponents would have the higher

[/SIZE]

[/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]fi [/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]nishing position.[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=1]

[SIZE=1]5) In the case of a three-way tie for the district winning position,

the tie would be resolved in the following manner. If any of
the tie-breakers results in one of the teams being ahead of the
other two, the tie is broken. If any of the tie-breakers result in
two teams remaining ahead of the third, then the two-way tie
breaker shall be used to determine the winner between those
two.
a) The tie-breaking mechanisms (in order) shall be:
i) If the tie remains between all three teams, the record in the
second game played against all district opponents involved
in the tie.
ii) If the tie remains between all three teams, the record in the
[/SIZE]

[/SIZE]

[SIZE=1][SIZE=1]fi [/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1]
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=1]

[/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]rst game played against all district opponents involved in[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=1]

[SIZE=1]the tie.

iii) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the total
points allowed in all seeded games shall be the next tiebreaker.
iv) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the total
points allowed in the second of each of the seeded games
shall be the next tie-breaker.
v) If the tie is still unbreakable, then a blind draw among the
three teams shall break the tie.
b) Additional tie-breaking mechanisms could be added, and

would be uniform for all three-team districts.

page 57

whoever wins second game in a three team district

[/SIZE]

[/SIZE]

Tin Cup Wrote:

[SIZE=1][SIZE=1]IV) District Tournament Seeding Regulations[/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1]
[/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]A) For district tournaments with three teams, the district tournament[/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1]
[SIZE=1]shall be seeded in accordance with the following three-team
seeding regulations:
1) Each team in a three-team district is required to play the other
two teams in the district in two contests each year, at mutually
agreed sites. These games will produce a uniform means of
ranking the teams by seed within these districts.
2) The team with the highest seed (one seed) receives a bye in the
district tournament, and advances to the championship game.

3) The remaining two teams would play in the

[/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]fi [/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]rst round of[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=1]

[SIZE=1]the district tournament with the loser of that game being

eliminated.
4) In the case of a two-way tie for the district winning position,
the winner in the second game played between the tied district

opponents would have the higher

[/SIZE]

[/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]fi [/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]nishing position.[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=1]

[SIZE=1]5) In the case of a three-way tie for the district winning position,

the tie would be resolved in the following manner. If any of
the tie-breakers results in one of the teams being ahead of the
other two, the tie is broken. If any of the tie-breakers result in
two teams remaining ahead of the third, then the two-way tie
breaker shall be used to determine the winner between those
two.
a) The tie-breaking mechanisms (in order) shall be:
i) If the tie remains between all three teams, the record in the
second game played against all district opponents involved
in the tie.
ii) If the tie remains between all three teams, the record in the
[/SIZE]

[/SIZE]

[SIZE=1][SIZE=1]fi [/SIZE][/SIZE][SIZE=1]
[/SIZE]

[SIZE=1]

[/SIZE][SIZE=1][SIZE=1]rst game played against all district opponents involved in[/SIZE][/SIZE]

[SIZE=1]

[SIZE=1]the tie.

iii) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the total
points allowed in all seeded games shall be the next tiebreaker.
iv) If the tie remains between all three teams, then the total
points allowed in the second of each of the seeded games
shall be the next tie-breaker.
v) If the tie is still unbreakable, then a blind draw among the
three teams shall break the tie.
b) Additional tie-breaking mechanisms could be added, and

would be uniform for all three-team districts.

page 57

whoever wins second game in a three team district

[/SIZE]

[/SIZE]

is all this now moot since the 59th & 60th are combined this year??

HORNET POWER Wrote:is all this now moot since the 59th & 60th are combined this year??

I was wondering the same thing Hornet Power. I think they are still using the 59th and 60th districts for seeding purposes in the super-district.
The #1 seeds get first round byes;
#2 (59th) vs. #3 (60th) the loser is eliminated and the winner plays #1 (60th); #2 (60th) vs. #3 (59th) the loser is eliminated and the winner plays #1 (59th);
Then the two winners play for the #1 and #2 seeds and the two losers play for the #3 and #4 seeds.

If I am wrong on this please correct it. I would like to know also.