Bluegrassrivals

Full Version: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows sells 8.3 million copies in it's first 24 hours
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
That's only in the United States, hopefully I can find out how many were sold internationally.

I managed to read the entire 759 pages this weekend and it was a pretty good way to end the series.


All was well.
I just don't get it. A little boy as a wizard, but that's just me, lol.
He's 17....is that little?

There's also well over 10 people who die in this book, some in very greusome ways. Like a giant snake tearing it's way out of a lady's body.

What started as a children's book, has matured with the age of the characters.

Yes, he was 11 in the first book, but each books represents another year in his life.
*Thanks to CNN.com

No other book, not even any of the six previous Potters, has been so desired, so quickly. "Deathly Hallows" averaged more than 300,000 copies in sales per hour -- more than 5,000 a minute -- in the United States. The $34.99 book, even allowing for discounts, generated far more revenue than the opening weekend of the latest Potter movie, "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix," which came out July 10.

"This weekend kids and adults alike are sitting on buses, in the park, on airplanes and in restaurants reading 'Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.' The conversations the readers have been waiting to have for 10 years have just begun."

Both Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble announced that pre-orders exceeded 1 million. In a truly Beatles-esque moment, seven of the top best sellers on Amazon were Potter-related Sunday, including the audio CD of "Deathly Hallows" and a box set of all seven Potters coming out in September.

Reviews for "Deathly Hallows" have been almost universally ecstatic, and reader enthusiasm apparently intact despite, prerelease "spoilers" that proliferated on the Internet.
ComfortEagle Wrote:He's 17....is that little?

There's also well over 10 people who die in this book, some in very greusome ways. Like a giant snake tearing it's way out of a lady's body.

What started as a children's book, has matured with the age of the characters.

Yes, he was 11 in the first book, but each books represents another year in his life.

The Harry Potter series is awesome. I'll read this book but I have to wait until my gf finishes it though I've been told some spoilers so far it will still be awesome.
I loved it.
I love it finished it in three days the only bad thing is im left with wanting more i know its the end but i just want more of it i didnt want it to end
PLAYBOY5 Wrote:I just don't get it. A little boy as a wizard, but that's just me, lol.
It's little when you are 5'5 90 pounds!
I SAID LITTLE MEANING SIZE..Age has nothing to do with my statement! Gary Coleman is 105 years old, but is he little? I do believe he is, lol.! But my point has nothing to do with anything, because well, stats don't lie and my one person not getting it is overweighed by the trillions who watch and buy his stuff! Not knocking it at all, but me myself, just don't get the punchline that draws so many people! I mean the plot to the story has been done time and time again, and this time ..well, we all know the outcome to this result!!
Thorn67 Wrote:I love it finished it in three days the only bad thing is im left with wanting more i know its the end but i just want more of it i didnt want it to end

I agree, the epilogue was not long enough for me...it was only like 6 pages. I really would have liked to have seen more about what happened to the other characters.

I have a strong feeling that she intended to end the book the chapter before, but then to make sure no one thought Voldemort was coming back, she threw in the epilogue.
Well we may get our wish, in an interview with JKR, she announced that she will be making a Harry Potter Encyclopedia:

The encyclopedia would include back stories of characters she has already written but had to cut for the sake of narrative arc (“I've said before that Dean Thomas had a much more interesting history than ever appeared in the books”Wink, as well as details about the characters who survive “Deathly Hallows,” characters who continue to live on in Rowling’s mind in a clearly defined magical world.


JKR also stated that the character reprieve was Arthur Weasley, meaning that she had originally intended for him to die, but killed off two other characters instead.

The full article is here:

http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/19935372/
For the millions in the midst of the seven stages of mourning for the end of the Harry Potter era, take heart.
In her first tell-all interview since the release of “Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows,” J.K. Rowling told TODAY’s Meredith Vieira she “probably will” publish a Potter encyclopedia, promising many more details about her beloved characters and the fate of the wizarding world beyond the few clues provided in the seventh book’s epilogue.
“I suppose I have [started] because the raw material is all in my notes,” Rowling said.

The encyclopedia would include back stories of characters she has already written but had to cut for the sake of narrative arc (“I've said before that Dean Thomas had a much more interesting history than ever appeared in the books”Wink, as well as details about the characters who survive “Deathly Hallows,” characters who continue to live on in Rowling’s mind in a clearly defined magical world.
Hogwarts, for example, has a new headmaster (“McGonagall was really getting on a bit”Wink, and Rowling said she can see Harry going back to give the “odd talk” on Defense Against the Dark Arts. That class, by the way, is now led by a permanent professor, since Voldemort’s death broke the jinx that didn’t allow a teacher to remain in the position for more than a year.
Rowling freely offered up these details to Vieira and the 14 fans who asked her questions at Edinburgh Castle in Scotland on Tuesday. In fact, now that she is now longer burdened with guarding the secrets of Book 7, Rowling seemed to delight in discussing her plot choices and clearing up the mysteries that have previously surrounded the books.
[B]The character Rowling couldn’t bear to kill
[/B]One of the big stories that has been floating among fans for more than a year is that one character gets a reprieve from death, while two others Rowling didn’t intend to kill end up dying in “Deathly Hallows.”
“Mr. Weasley, he was the person who got a reprieve,” Rowling said. “When I sketched out the books, Mr. Weasley was due to die in Book 5.”
Instead, another father dies in the end of Book 7.
Though Rowling couldn’t bear to kill off Arthur Weasley, that didn't mean the other deaths in the book were easy to take. Given the bloodbath that is “Deathly Hallows,” the writing of it was bound to be an emotional roller coaster.
But nothing in the entire process of the series was more difficult than writing the scene when Harry, accompanied by his lost loved ones — including his parents, James and Lily, and his godfather, Sirius — walks into the forest with the intent of sacrificing his life in the name of defeating Voldemort, Rowling said, adding it is her favorite passage in all seven books.
“I didn't cry as I was writing [that chapter], but when I finished writing, I had an enormous explosion of emotion and I cried and cried and cried,” Rowling said.

“That was partly because of the content — and partly because it had been planned for so long and been roughed out for so long. And to write the definitive version felt like a — a huge climax.”
“The Deathly Hallows” is the climax to the last 17 years of Rowling’s life, a time when she has gone from a single, divorced mother living on public assistance to a happily married mother of three and one of the richest women in the world.
It’s now time to sit back for a bit and enjoy the life that Harry has given her, Rowling said. And, when she’s ready, there’s always that encyclopedia waiting in the wings.
“I’m not going to do it tomorrow because I’d really like a break,” Rowling said, laughing. “So you may be waiting.”
I was hoping there would be a little more background about everything that happens. The epilogue was poorly thrown together. It should've been longer or not even included.
Fenix Wrote:I was hoping there would be a little more background about everything that happens. The epilogue was poorly thrown together. It should've been longer or not even included.


JKR said that the epilogue wasn't the original epilogue she intended to include. She said the original had a lot more backstory about what happened to everyone, but she felt that it dragged on for the sake of dragging on and she didn't want that.

However, she did say that she will be putting together an Encyclopedia that will include all the characters backstory as well as what happens to them after book 7.
I read an article on Yahoo today that gave information about a lot of the chracters future careers.
Fenix Wrote:I read an article on Yahoo today that gave information about a lot of the chracters future careers.

Do you have a link?
Sorry it took so long to reply. Here's the link. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/potter_s_afte...Z_mt0ZYV4B