Bluegrassrivals

Pick6 Wrote:http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016...-forecast/

That light you saw at the end of the tunnel for Trump - it was a train about to roll over him. The Trump convention gave him what might charitably be considered a dead cat bounce. The DNC convention was not much better, but Trump's refusal to focus on Hillary and Obama while campaigning is fueling her rise in the polls. She is now up +6.8 in the Real Clear Politics average of polls. There has never been a worse Republican presidential candidate.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:That light you saw at the end of the tunnel for Trump - it was a train about to roll over him. The Trump convention gave him what might charitably be considered a dead cat bounce. The DNC convention was not much better, but Trump's refusal to focus on Hillary and Obama while campaigning is fueling her rise in the polls. She is now up +6.8 in the Real Clear Politics average of polls. There has never been a worse Republican presidential candidate.

I'm no politician, but I believe even I would not fall for some of the things Trump has. If he would drop the reflexive responses, the media would not have so much to get frenzied about.

In saying that, the DNC was sad in comparison to the RNC, right up until the Khisr Khan moment. Khan was brought in to cast Trump in the worst possible light, and thanks to a complicit media he was successful. That does not alter certain constants. Khan was hired to do a politically correct hit job, and though Dems had to go back 12 years to find the acceptable man for the job, it worked anyway. He read scripted remarks off of a teleprompter, very likely doctored by rabid DNC chipmunks for maximum effect. And please, how often do people walk around with a copy of the US Constitution in their pocket? Not that there is the first word in it to define legal immigration.

In further irony, Mr Khan's son was killed by a radical Islamic extremist. Hillary, of whose foreign policy failings are yet ablaze, wants to get as many of them in here as she possibly can. And while Trump would let in the sane Muslim immigrants, he'd rather keep the jihadis out as would any person of reason. There was no there, there, but once media discovered they could inject themselves into the process, Presidential elections have become the stuff of theater.

A surrogate would have been the logical choice to make the response to Mr Khisr, and although Trump is likely sage enough to judge the true intentions of this world's leaders with regard to interaction with this nation, he continues to underestimate media resourcefulness and willingness to bend the facts in order to keep him out of the White House. We still have 94 days left before the election, there is time for stability to right the ship for Trump.

Trump had an opportunity to go up double digits when the DNC came about and he blew it. The email scandal, not that it was a surprise, involving Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the top DNC officials should have been a blank checkbook that the Trump cashed. Instead, he has blown a major opportunity. The Republican candidate should easily be able to dispatch Hillary this election given her record.

Hillary will likely send an onslaught of people at Trump over these next couple of months, especially on twitter. Celebrities such as Rosie O'Donnell or Cher. She probably will find someone who worked for one of Trump's organizations and didn't have a good experience. Maybe someone who has a disability and was treated unfairly. Given that he will respond to almost anybody well-known who criticizes him, she will probably try to keep him pretty busy over the next few months responding to people via Twitter and other outlets.

WideRight05 Wrote:Trump had an opportunity to go up double digits when the DNC came about and he blew it. The email scandal, not that it was a surprise, involving Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the top DNC officials should have been a blank checkbook that the Trump cashed. Instead, he has blown a major opportunity. The Republican candidate should easily be able to dispatch Hillary this election given her record.

Hillary will likely send an onslaught of people at Trump over these next couple of months, especially on twitter. Celebrities such as Rosie O'Donnell or Cher. She probably will find someone who worked for one of Trump's organizations and didn't have a good experience. Maybe someone who has a disability and was treated unfairly. Given that he will respond to almost anybody well-known who criticizes him, she will probably try to keep him pretty busy over the next few months responding to people via Twitter and other outlets.

Trump falls for the petty stuff. If he doesn't straighten out his punches and quit making it easy for his critics, I could see him getting beat.

WideRight05 Wrote:Trump had an opportunity to go up double digits when the DNC came about and he blew it. The email scandal, not that it was a surprise, involving Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the top DNC officials should have been a blank checkbook that the Trump cashed. Instead, he has blown a major opportunity. The Republican candidate should easily be able to dispatch Hillary this election given her record.

Hillary will likely send an onslaught of people at Trump over these next couple of months, especially on twitter. Celebrities such as Rosie O'Donnell or Cher. She probably will find someone who worked for one of Trump's organizations and didn't have a good experience. Maybe someone who has a disability and was treated unfairly. Given that he will respond to almost anybody well-known who criticizes him, she will probably try to keep him pretty busy over the next few months responding to people via Twitter and other outlets.

Well said, Wide. Every minute that Trump spends attacking fellow Republicans and Hillary surrogates instead of attacking Hillary and Obama brings him a minute close to a landslide loss. He apparently has no self control. I caught a few minutes of Newt talking to Hannity today on my commute home and he made the same observation. I guess now that Newt has said what I have been saying for weeks, TRT will be admitting that we must be onto something. :biglmao:

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Well said, Wide. Every minute that Trump spends attacking fellow Republicans and Hillary surrogates instead of attacking Hillary and Obama brings him a minute close to a landslide loss. He apparently has no self control. I caught a few minutes of Newt talking to Hannity today on my commute home and he made the same observation. I guess now that Newt has said what I have been saying for weeks, TRT will be admitting that we must be onto something. :biglmao:

I heard Gary Johnson being interviewed on Stossel, he makes Nancy Pelosi look like a genius.

I have criticized Trump for being petty and argumentative. I don't defend him when he does that, not because he isn't right but because he looks like a foodfight participant. Articulating my prediction of mid 2015, Stewart Varney has been saying all week that it's Trump against the world.

TheRealThing Wrote:I heard Gary Johnson being interviewed on Stossel, he makes Nancy Pelosi look like a genius.

I have criticized Trump for being petty and argumentative. I don't defend him when he does that, not because he isn't right but because he looks like a foodfight participant. Articulating my prediction of mid 2015, Stewart Varney has been saying all week that it's Trump against the world.

Trump is 70 years old and his basic personality is not going to change. I watched his endorsement of Ryan, Ayotte, and McCain tonight. I could tell that Trump was trying not to focus on himself and to project the image of a team player, but he just could not resist focusing on himself.

Trump does not seem to understand that taking shots at Republican candidates during a presidential campaign is like shooting at his his own feet because he doesn't like his shoes. Attacking Republican politicians running for re-election makes it less likely that the supporters of those candidates will support him.

Trump gave me the impression that his advisers had twisted his arm to get him to announce the endorsements. I also question how effective an endorsement is when it follows months of criticism. Trump's endorsements seemed devoid of genuine enthusiasm. Likewise, many of the endorsements Trump has received seem half-hearted.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Trump is 70 years old and his basic personality is not going to change. I watched his endorsement of Ryan, Ayotte, and McCain tonight. I could tell that Trump was trying not to focus on himself and to project the image of a team player, but he just could not resist focusing on himself.

Trump does not seem to understand that taking shots at Republican candidates during a presidential campaign is like shooting at his his own feet because he doesn't like his shoes. Attacking Republican politicians running for re-election makes it less likely that the supporters of those candidates will support him.

Trump gave me the impression that his advisers had twisted his arm to get him to announce the endorsements. I also question how effective an endorsement is when it follows months of criticism. Trump's endorsements seemed devoid of genuine enthusiasm. Likewise, many of the endorsements Trump has received seem half-hearted.

Trump said a few things about McCain and Ryan, but both have been far more critically vocal about him. I mean, he had to stand up for himself. And I will agree that Trump shouldn't have slammed McCain's military record, which is sort of worn on his sleeve to the thinking of many, and stuck with policy or voting record or the like. But both McCain and Ryan are obviously impressed with their own greatness and their disdain for the upstart Trump has clearly shown through their snobbish members only arrogance when they made 'first strike' public comments about him.

Trump's reactions have been bluntly direct but then, he's no politician. And his truthful feelings are always out there while those of RINO's are concealed behind those ever so practiced façades. I'm not that impressed with McCain these days nor Ryan. Ayotte's involvement is a different matter and she's no idiot. She knows this was political theater, and she recognizes that though the circumstances surrounding the Khan family's performance at the DNC was a carefully orchestrated and elaborate set up, the perception produced by it for many Americans was none the less very productive. And the very real dignity and sensitivity of the Khan family, made any attempt on Trump's part to protect his honor seem self serving, as it was. Surrogates however, could have made the case in days following and been very successful in rendering an analysis that would have effectively extricated Mr Trump from blame and his polling numbers would be far better as we speak. So, as things stand, instead of a three day flap, we get a three week flap which is unfortunate and totally self inflicted. Trump knows he brought her criticism down on himself and he knows she handled his comments about the Khan deal the only way she could. I am not aware that he said anything bad about her.

Trump has handled things like this poorly because of the inflammatory prowess of an openly biased media, and because Republicans' continued fear of them makes them predictable targets. And yet straight talk can still put him in the White House and there is plenty of time to right the ship. The one criticism of yours toward Trump of which we are in total agreement is with his twitter account, which he uses like some sort of blog geek. That needs to go. Even when right, and he often is, the harsh back and forth is beneath any President. Let Hillary cloud the twittersphere with witless-isms, she's a natural.

Trump's endorsements were good enough and the best he could render and not have it look plastic.

^The endorsements did look plastic to me. Trump supporters keep blaming the media for his nosediving poll numbers, but the media is no more hostile to him than it has been for any other Republican presidential candidate. If he wanted the media to treat him fairly in the general campaign, then he should have faced off with Hillary and Bernie in the Democrats' primaries.

Trump needs to stop talking about himself incessantly and start using words like "we" and "our" much more. More than anything else, he needs to focus his attacks on Obama and Hillary and stop whining about how badly he is being treated and how everything is rigged against him. Whining is not an admirable trait in a presidential candidate.

IMO, Trump's endorsements of McCain and Ayotte while campaigning in Wisconsin was a waste of time. Key presidential endorsements are much more effective during joint appearances in the endorsee's home district or state, IMO. Trump needs to win Arizona and winning New Hampshire would be a great pickup for him. More importantly, a Trump presidency without Republican control of the Senate would be disastrous.

Good grief. So you think only Trump supporters, who evidently must have their own news network, blame the media? And it follows of course, that Trump supporters are somehow mentally inferior to the more enlightened #NeverTrump crowd? I'm certain that Stewart Varney and Lou Dobbs would take exception to that.

I don't what held your interest back in the 90's, but I was paying attention. With the emergence of the Clintons, came the age of reckless distortion. Bill said he did not have sex with that woman (and I'd bet he still believes that), and Hillary says James Comey verified her truthfulness on the email scandal. She will not hesitate to make ObamaCare permanent, which will put all retired people as well as the entire well being of the nation for that matter, in financial jeopardy. Concerns about the field of energy, national defense, social justice, women's rights will be ever more loosely defined, civil justice, so-called free education, global warming, and the appointment of more rabid liberals to the Supreme Court are only hitting the highlights of the lunacy to come.

To say there is no difference between a Clinton Presidency and a Trump Presidency, as you have done on here, is jaw dropping.

TheRealThing Wrote:Good grief. So you think only Trump supporters, who evidently must have their own news network, blame the media? And it follows of course, that Trump supporters are somehow mentally inferior to the more enlightened #NeverTrump crowd? I'm certain that Stewart Varney and Lou Dobbs would take exception to that.

I don't what held your interest back in the 90's, but I was paying attention. With the emergence of the Clintons, came the age of reckless distortion. Bill said he did not have sex with that woman (and I'd bet he still believes that), and Hillary says James Comey verified her truthfulness on the email scandal. She will not hesitate to make ObamaCare permanent, which will put all retired people as well as the entire well being of the nation for that matter, in financial jeopardy. Concerns about the field of energy, national defense, social justice, women's rights will be ever more loosely defined, civil justice, so-called free education, global warming, and the appointment of more rabid liberals to the Supreme Court are only hitting the highlights of the lunacy to come.

To say there is no difference between a Clinton Presidency and a Trump Presidency, as you have done on here, is jaw dropping.

Trump's problems are all the media's fault. Got it.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Trump's problems are all the media's fault. Got it.

The media make no embellishments nor do they take any liberties in casting the latest in what has been a long line of Republican candidates for President in a bad light, while on the other hand they like you, are entirely objective with Hillary Clinton. Got it.

TheRealThing Wrote:The media make no embellishments nor do they take any liberties in casting the latest in what has been a long line of Republican candidates for President in a bad light, while on the other hand they like you, are entirely objective with Hillary Clinton. Got it.

No, you don't "got it." I, and other conservatives who are not Trump cultists, have been warning for months that the biased media would crucify Trump once he became the nominee and began running against Hillary because Trump would be such an easy target. It is true that the media would have sided with Hillary against any Republican candidate, but Trumps inability to stay on message is compounding his troubles.

Face it - Trump is a very poor general campaign candidate. His only chance of beating what is perhaps the weakest Democratic candidate in U.S. history is an October surprise of unprecedented proportion. This is the same woman who struggled to put away socialist Bernie Sanders, even with the DNC rigging the primary process for her. Trump is a disaster for the GOP.

TheRealThing Wrote:And you manage to keep dodging this, but Run has it right, if and when the Trump candidacy is dispatched, Cruz will get the Democrat's Full Monty, and it will be merciless. The last Obama campaign proved how short people's memories really are, and there will be no holds barred. I don't think Cruz can handle it but, I think Trump would eat Hillary alive

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Trump has never had to deal with an adversarial media like the one he would face as a candidate running against Hillary Clinton. When he has been confronted with tough interviews, he has fallen on his face. Look at how long and loud he has been whining about Megyn Kelly.

If Hillary runs against Trump, Democrats will successfully portray him as a very shady businessman. We will see an endless parader of Trump "victims" who have had their lives shattered by Trump's bankruptcies, Trump University, etc. You can expect the victims to include disabled people, vets, single women, minorities, and every other imaginable subgroup that the media can muster.

Trump is such a flawed candidate, I am not so sure that Hillary getting indicted would enable Trump to beat her. Hillary's weaknesses are easy to see but Trump is much more vulnerable to her attacks than his supporters want to admit. If Democrats have to substitute Biden or Elizabeth Warren for Hillary, Trump would be at an even bigger disadvantage. Being a prolific Tweeter will only take a candidate so far.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:No, you don't "got it." I, and other conservatives who are not Trump cultists, have been warning for months that the biased media would crucify Trump once he became the nominee and began running against Hillary because Trump would be such an easy target. It is true that the media would have sided with Hillary against any Republican candidate, but Trumps inability to stay on message is compounding his troubles.

Face it - Trump is a very poor general campaign candidate. His only chance of beating what is perhaps the weakest Democratic candidate in U.S. history is an October surprise of unprecedented proportion. This is the same woman who struggled to put away socialist Bernie Sanders, even with the DNC rigging the primary process for her. Trump is a disaster for the GOP.

Well, it's a little early to be planting that flag quite yet. I don't know what you are, but you're certainly no conservative, I might believe Libertarian. But hey, if one can govern with his head stuck in the sand, you're home free. :biggrin:

Trump's support is among the people, who BTW do not have benefit of a complicit 24/7 media, or a corrupt political establishment to speak out for them. The news and the criticism from Obama and the rest of the arroganstocrisy was expected as I have pointed out to you over and over again. I don't implicitly trust the heavily influenced polls, and I don't believe the obvious lies of the bought-in media. But you go ahead and base your absurdly illegitimate views on the same snakes you just called out for rigging the system against Sanders, and I'll take my lumps out here in reality.

TheRealThing Wrote:Well, it's a little early to be planting that flag quite yet. I don't know what you are, but you're certainly no conservative, I might believe Libertarian. But hey, if one can govern with his head stuck in the sand, you're home free. :biggrin:

Trump's support is among the people, who BTW do not have benefit of a complicit 24/7 media, or a corrupt political establishment to speak out for them. The news and the criticism from Obama and the rest of the arroganstocrisy was expected as I have pointed out to you over and over again. I don't implicitly trust the heavily influenced polls, and I don't believe the obvious lies of the bought-in media. But you go ahead and base your absurdly illegitimate views on the same snakes you just called out for rigging the system against Sanders, and I'll take my lumps out here in reality.

That's funny stuff, TRT. A man who has repeatedly posted links to the conservative-turned-trump blog Gateway Pundit lecturing anybody on what constitutes a legitimate media source? :biglmao:

Polls that show Trump trails Hillary in the campaign by a wide margin are not wrong. People should not judge other people's character and polls based on where they stand on Donald J. Trump. That is what Trump does.

Now, back to the thread topic. 538, and I do not consider Nate Silver's analysis to be any more valid than dozens of other political analyst's opinions, now says that there is an 83 percent chance that Hillary Clinton will win the presidency. The RealClearPolitics average of national presidential polls now gives Hillary and edge of 7.0 percent.

The latest state polls have Trump trailing in every single recently polled battleground state. Not only that, Trump has placed traditionally Republican states like Arizona and Georgia into play.

Since 1952, no Republican has ever lost among college educated white voters. Trump trails in that demographic.

Yeah, all the polls must be rigged against Trump. That's the ticket. :biglmao:

You are old enough to know what a conservative and what a good presidential candidate looks like. Trump is neither.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:That's funny stuff, TRT. A man who has repeatedly posted links to the conservative-turned-trump blog Gateway Pundit lecturing anybody on what constitutes a legitimate media source? :biglmao:

Polls that show Trump trails Hillary in the campaign by a wide margin are not wrong. People should not judge other people's character and polls based on where they stand on Donald J. Trump. That is what Trump does.

Now, back to the thread topic. 538, and I do not consider Nate Silver's analysis to be any more valid than dozens of other political analyst's opinions, now says that there is an 83 percent chance that Hillary Clinton will win the presidency. The RealClearPolitics average of national presidential polls now gives Hillary and edge of 7.0 percent.

The latest state polls have Trump trailing in every single recently polled battleground state. Not only that, Trump has placed traditionally Republican states like Arizona and Georgia into play.

Since 1952, no Republican has ever lost among college educated white voters. Trump trails in that demographic.

Yeah, all the polls must be rigged against Trump. That's the ticket. :biglmao:

You are old enough to know what a conservative and what a good presidential candidate looks like. Trump is neither.

I've also cited 538 on a number of occasions. And I'm old enough to know when somebody is lacking to the point where they take the easy road and try to take me to task using my own ideas. I also know the same guy who in one breath says he doesn't have the time or the inclination to argue with me, only to immediately demonstrate that cannot then stop himself from doing just that, isn't exactly that well grounded in real terms.

Romney looked like a good candidate and still got beat, and for exactly the same reason Trump now trails in the polls. The media lie like the dogs they are, and you like them, can neither resist barking with them or chasing after them. This is not about a good looking candidate. Paul Ryan recently said the same thing I have said, in that the Republican Party is in a fight to rediscover their soul. For decades now they have allowed the Dems to define both parties (not that I believe he can actually connect the right dots). That being the case, to hear them tell it, Dems are nearly godlike in their intellect, generosity and compassion. And of course the Republicans to hear Dems and the media tell it, are lying, greedy, and passé relics of another time.

You do base your absurdly illegitimate views on what the media tell you, and like I said, it aint quite over yet so you might want to save that victory lap for a time more apropos.

TheRealThing Wrote:I've also cited 538 on a number of occasions. And I'm old enough to know when somebody is lacking to the point where they take the easy road and try to take me to task using my own ideas. I also know the same guy who in one breath says he doesn't have the time or the inclination to argue with me, only to immediately demonstrate that cannot then stop himself from doing just that, isn't exactly that well grounded in real terms.

Romney looked like a good candidate and still got beat, and for exactly the same reason Trump now trails in the polls. The media lie like the dogs they are, and you like them, can neither resist barking with them or chasing after them. This is not about a good looking candidate. Paul Ryan recently said the same thing I have said, in that the Republican Party is in a fight to rediscover their soul. For decades now they have allowed the Dems to define both parties (not that I believe he can actually connect the right dots). That being the case, to hear them tell it, Dems are nearly godlike in their intellect, generosity and compassion. And of course the Republicans to hear Dems and the media tell it, are lying, greedy, and passé relics of another time.

You do base your absurdly illegitimate views on what the media tell you, and like I said, it aint quite over yet so you might want to save that victory lap for a time more apropos.

The Republican Party is not going to rediscover its soul in the body of a liberal Democrat running on the GOP ticket. Trump is a cancer on the Republican brand. I don't see how a conservative can possibly be an enthusiastic supporter of Donald Trump and you are nothing if not a fervent Trumpster.

My opinion of Trump is based on my personal observations, not on media accounts, and certainly not on the opinions expressed by The Gateway Pundit.:biglmao:

Hoot Gibson Wrote:The Republican Party is not going to rediscover its soul in the body of a liberal Democrat running on the GOP ticket. Trump is a cancer on the Republican brand. I don't see how a conservative can possibly be an enthusiastic supporter of Donald Trump and you are nothing if not a fervent Trumpster.

My opinion of Trump is based on my personal observations, not on media accounts, and certainly not on the opinions expressed by The Gateway Pundit.:biglmao:

Republicans need to decide between being only marginally to the right of rabid liberalism, or reversing their recent course to return at minimum to the conservative values of the Reagan Era. The psychopathic ravings you've had the nerve to put up on this site makes the Gateway Pundit look like William F Buckley.

TheRealThing Wrote:Republicans need to decide between being only marginally to the right of rabid liberalism, or reversing their recent course to return at minimum to the conservative values of the Reagan Era. The psychopathic ravings you've had the nerve to put up on this site makes the Gateway Pundit look like William F Buckley.

The nerve that you have to lecture anybody about how they should vote after failing to perform your civic duty during the Kentucky primary elections is astoundingly hypocritical. Trump is a liberal posing as a Republican because he knew that he could not beat Hillary Clinton in a primary election. It is obvious that he cannot beat her in a general election either. Just because you are comfortable voting for a liberal in November is no reason to expect conservatives to do the same.

You had your chance to vote for a conservative and you passed. Now you are nothing but a shill for liberal Donald Trump.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:The nerve that you have to lecture anybody about how they should vote after failing to perform your civic duty during the Kentucky primary elections is astoundingly hypocritical. Trump is a liberal posing as a Republican because he knew that he could not beat Hillary Clinton in a primary election. It is obvious that he cannot beat her in a general election either. Just because you are comfortable voting for a liberal in November is no reason to expect conservatives to do the same.

You had your chance to vote for a conservative and you passed. Now you are nothing but a shill for liberal Donald Trump.

Hillary has done nothing but lie for 30 years and you're obviously comfortable with the idea of her being in the White House given your feverish campaign contribution to her cause. Trump on he other hand, whether you agree with him or not, at least speaks his true feelings on matters.

And as I just posted, your own confusion in misidentifying yourself as a conservative causes you to fall short where liberals are concerned as well.

TheRealThing Wrote:Hillary has done nothing but lie for 30 years and you're obviously comfortable with the idea of her being in the White House given your feverish campaign contribution to her cause. Trump on he other hand, whether you agree with him or not, at least speaks his true feelings on matters.

And as I just posted, your own confusion in misidentifying yourself as a conservative causes you to fall short where liberals are concerned as well.

I know it makes you feel like a conservative by touting Trump as a conservative, but he has been a liberal his entire adult life. You are right about Hillary lying her entire political career, but Trump has been caught in one lie after another since he became a politician. Before that, he was a dishonest crony capitalist who bribed crooked politicians like Hillary.

You are no conservative. Had you ever been a conservative, you would not have been registered as a Democrat and you certainly would not have supported a dishonest liberal like Donald Trump throughout the primary season.

Conservatives, including me, warned you that Trump would be a lousy candidate against Hillary and we were right. The truth hurts, but admitting you were mistaken about Trump might soothe your conscience.

TheRealThing Wrote:Oh, and BTW. You're dreaming the impossible dream if you think there are millions of Republicans who feel the same way you do about Trump. They'll all come home and vote for Trump.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:A candidate cannot insult as many people in his own party as often as Trump has and unite his opponents' supporters behind him.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:I know it makes you feel like a conservative by touting Trump as a conservative, but he has been a liberal his entire adult life. You are right about Hillary lying her entire political career, but Trump has been caught in one lie after another since he became a politician. Before that, he was a dishonest crony capitalist who bribed crooked politicians like Hillary.

You are no conservative. Had you ever been a conservative, you would not have been registered as a Democrat and you certainly would not have supported a dishonest liberal like Donald Trump throughout the primary season.

Conservatives, including me, warned you that Trump would be a lousy candidate against Hillary and we were right. The truth hurts, but admitting you were mistaken about Trump might soothe your conscience.

I know you are but what am I? pathetic. I never had a thing to hide on here and I know I divulged my voter registration status at least four years ago. Your desperation to rehabilitate your on-line persona clearly shows through when you grasp at every possible straw in an attempt to elevate your own illegitimate argument by perpetrating personal slander in what you laughably think of as debate. According to you, Jet is an idiot, as is everybody but Wide right now, because you think he still carries your water. But hey, not to despair, you may yet be noticed by the rabid chipmunks of Hillary's camp and who knows, maybe you'll get a high five or even a job offer. :biggrin:

In the end, people of substance will turn their backs on the first lady of lies and you will still be the guy who got it all wrong, forever recorded here for all to see. The false prophet always does his master's bidding and you've certainly played Hillary's attack dog-ette on this forum.

TheRealThing Wrote:I know you are but what am I? pathetic. I never had a thing to hide on here and I know I divulged my voter registration status at least four years ago. Your desperation to rehabilitate your on-line persona clearly shows through when you grasp at every possible straw in an attempt to elevate your own illegitimate argument by perpetrating personal slander in what you laughably think of as debate. According to you, Jet is an idiot, as is everybody but Wide right now, because you think he still carries your water. But hey, not to despair, you may yet be noticed by the rabid chipmunks of Hillary's camp and who knows, maybe you'll get a high five or even a job offer. :biggrin:

In the end, people of substance will turn their backs on the first lady of lies and you will still be the guy who got it all wrong, forever recorded here for all to see. The false prophet always does his master's bidding and you've certainly played Hillary's attack dog-ette on this forum.

Another nonsensical post by the master of self-puffery. Nobody uses more words to say less than you do, but these insultathons in which you are engaging are also going on the record. Things may change, but so far your predictions of a Trump cakewalk and Republicans rallying to Trump's support are the biggest misses in this thread. What would Trump have to do to lose your adoration? :lmao:

FYI, Wide has never carried water for me or anybody else. Your arrogance and condescension know no bounds. You are Trump's intellectual and spiritual twin.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Another nonsensical post by the master of self-puffery. Nobody uses more words to say less than you do, but these insultathons in which you are engaging are also going on the record. Things may change, but so far your predictions of a Trump cakewalk and Republicans rallying to Trump's support are the biggest misses in this thread. What would Trump have to do to lose your adoration? :lmao:

FYI, Wide has never carried water for me or anybody else. Your arrogance and condescension know no bounds. You are Trump's intellectual and spiritual twin.

Yeah, you're pretty hard to clean after as long as you can keep the conversation in Hooterville, and out of factual territory. Trump is the nominee, but you still cling to some ridiculous hope that #NeverTrump will pull a trick out of their generous posteriors and strip Trump of the nomination. :biglmao:

I know the aura of delusion is strong, and thick, which forms that cloud immediately around your keyboard, and reality is a many filtered thing for you. And as I keep pointing out, the opinion of that imaginary audience to which you evidently play, does not jive with how you're perceived on here. The only 'sell' you've managed is to yourself, obviously fan #1 among the faceless followers of your inventions. We have 90 days left before votes are cast, then we'll see if your candidate is elected or mine.

TheRealThing Wrote:Yeah, you're pretty hard to clean after as long as you can keep the conversation in Hooterville, and out of factual territory. Trump is the nominee, but you still cling to some ridiculous hope that #NeverTrump will pull a trick out of their generous posteriors and strip Trump of the nomination. :biglmao:

I know the aura of delusion is strong, and thick, which forms that cloud immediately around your keyboard, and reality is a many filtered thing for you. And as I keep pointing out, the opinion of that imaginary audience to which you evidently play, does not jive with how you're perceived on here. The only 'sell' you've managed is to yourself, obviously fan #1 among the faceless followers of your inventions. We have 90 days left before votes are cast, then we'll see if your candidate is elected or mine.

If insults and lies were good things, then you would be a saint.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:If insults and lies were good things, then you would be a saint.

Oh believe me, I can insult with you any day, but the lies, those I leave up to professionals like you.