Bluegrassrivals

Dr Ben Carson is officially on team Trump. He believes as I do, that it will take a special man to break the strangle hold that special interests and establishment politics have on this country. I'm sure the naysayers will try to downplay Carson's endorsement, but they know it is a very big deal. Carson is clear minded and articulate and has offered to help heal America in any way he can.

He is a true servant of "the people", and would be an extremely valuable addition to any prospective administration.

Having said that, we can expect the fury of the political establishment to stoop to any lie or any dirty trick necessary to usurp the will of the people. Republicans will continue to team up with Democrats to scuttle their own nominating process. And all of this will go on, while Obama and corps speak of Republicans as if they were the filth of the earth. I just heard him and Canadian Prime Minister Trudeau, mercilessly slam them on national TV only yesterday because of their Global Warming obstructionist tactics. The attacks will come hot and heavy and the media will be a more than willing accomplice to that end. IMHO, things will be both embarrassing and disgusting, not to mention traitorous, over the coming days leading up to the Florida and Ohio primary votes. I never accepted the bad rap being pinned on Donald J Trump, and the more this thing unfolds, the more comfortable I am with my own analysis.

We have been presented an historic opportunity to snatch the glory of America out of the jaws of destruction. Hopefully the voter will seize upon that opportunity, and the once in history wonder which we call America and which is characterized by freedom and liberty for all, will survive a little while longer. How good would it be to once again see it be politically correct to honor God in this land, or the scourge of anti fossil fuels regulations lifted, the US military restored to their rightful place among the world's armed forces, the economy returned to the boom times of Reagan? I submit that it would be truly marvelous. Make America Great Again.

2 Chronicles 7:14 (KJV)
14 If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.

Dr. Carson is so articulate and intelligent. He would've been my first choice had he been just the slightest bit assertive and had more knowledge of foreign affairs. I think his endorsement will be more of a factor than Christie's.

To be honest, his endorsement shocked my shoes off.

Granny Bear Wrote:Dr. Carson is so articulate and intelligent. He would've been my first choice had he been just the slightest bit assertive and had more knowledge of foreign affairs. I think his endorsement will be more of a factor than Christie's.

To be honest, his endorsement shocked my shoes off.

Well, 'The Family Leader' President Bob Vander Plaats, is on TV as we speak downing Carson for having endorsed Trump. Arrogantly calling his judgment into question and speaking down to him in condescending terms in saying "he should have delved into the Scriptures a little more deeply." And we can be sure that his comments will be followed by an escalation of Carson detractors who will come on TV to offer adverse psychological profiles and all manner of mental deficiencies now that he is on team Trump.

But I think his endorsement makes sense. The same folks who have been so busy the past several decades bringing us the present level of social, geo political, and financial chaos, are the ones who have taken the point on bringing down the Trump candidacy. According to what I have heard, it's all about the money and power which has infected DC. A President Trump would upset that apple cart and they'll say and or do whatever is necessary, to prevent it from happening.

My fear is that people have been so blinded they will wind up caving to the establishment pressure once again. I mean I guess if one is happy with what happened to Romney, I suppose he might want to let them tell him what to do again. I heard Rubio speaking today, suggesting to likely Cruz voters of Ohio, that they should consider ganging up on Trump by changing their votes to Kasich. The level of deceit is historic.

TheRealThing Wrote:Well, 'The Family Leader' President Bob Vander Plaats, is on TV as we speak downing Carson for having endorsed Trump. Arrogantly calling his judgment into question and speaking down to him in condescending terms in saying "he should have delved into the Scriptures a little more deeply." And we can be sure that his comments will be followed by an escalation of Carson detractors who will come on TV to offer adverse psychological profiles and all manner of mental deficiencies now that he is on team Trump.

But I think his endorsement makes sense. The same folks who have been so busy the past several decades bringing us the present level of social, geo political, and financial chaos, are the ones who have taken the point on bringing down the Trump candidacy. According to what I have heard, it's all about the money and power which has infected DC. A President Trump would upset that apple cart and they'll say and or do whatever is necessary, to prevent it from happening.

My fear is that people have been so blinded they will wind up caving to the establishment pressure once again. I mean I guess if one is happy with what happened to Romney, I suppose he might want to let them tell him what to do again. I heard Rubio speaking today, suggesting to likely Cruz voters of Ohio, that they should consider ganging up on Trump by changing their votes to Kasich. The level of deceit is historic.

So, you like my sig?
nicker:

I'm just as mixed on Trump as I was when he first started running. Some of his antics are really getting out of hand IMO. I thought Cruz was the best choice at first and I'm sticking with that but will re-evaluate if this election turns into a scenario of Donald Trump going against Hillary Clinton.

If Trump chooses Cruz or Rubio to be his VP should he hang on to his lead and win then I will be much more likely to support. If he chooses someone like Christie and especially someone like Kasich, I will heavily consider voting third party.

I do feel that Trump has done some good things in this election, but we have sent moderate after moderate since Reagan and it has not worked out successfully for the party, and even worse for the country because it has led to liberal machinations all over. Trump may have some areas he leans more conservative such as immigration or the elimination of political correctness, but he's more of a moderate overall.

I just don't know, at this point. I'm seeing Christian leaders divided, the party divided, and I'm still not sure what to think of Trump. I don't trust him to stick to what he said he would do, and although he claims to take a stand for Christians, he hasn't indicated what he would do with the exception of pointing out overseas persecution - something even Barack Obama has done. Given that Cruz has a consistent record of standing up to the establishment, I cast my vote for him and still am leaning toward him heavily. As with Trump, Cruz is nowhere near flawless. But I just have to stick with him because he has such a consistent record in defending Christians, the right to life, and standing up against illegal immigration.

I understand your logic. I'm still reeling over Carson throwing his support to Trump and not to Kasich

Unbelieveable......I don't know what to say.......:truestory: Coming soon a new Trump Carson Tower maybe. nicker:

Granny Bear Wrote:I understand your logic. I'm still reeling over Carson throwing his support to Trump and not to Kasich

Granny, Kasich has no chance of winning the nomination, so it really makes no sense for anybody to endorse him at this point. Kasich is probably staying in the race and hoping for a contested convention, so that he can bargain for the No. 2 spot on somebody's ticket.

Kasich failed to turn in enough valid signatures to qualify for the Pennsylvania and Illinois ballots. A Rubio supporter filed a protest in Pennsylvania but did so at 5:13 PM on the filing deadline. Nobody protested his candidacy in Illinois, where he was hundreds of signatures short.

I will be very disappointed if Cruz agreed to be Trump's running mate. A Trump presidency would be a disaster for this country and being the VP for a dopey president will not help anybody's political career.

I told my family months ago that there is no way that Trump is ever going to agree to debate Cruz one-on-one and, sure enough, Trump is already talking about the debates being "boring" and stating that there have been enough debates already. He was clueless last night.

Somebody tweeted last night that anybody who was playing a drinking game where they had to take a drink whenever Trump said "deal" was probably already dead.

As bad as I believe a Trump presidency would be, if the establishment maneuvers to deny the nomination to anybody who wins a plurality of votes will set the Republican Party back decades, IMO. Voters will not unite behind Romney or anybody else who has not campaigned and won the most votes going into the convention. If the delegate leader is Trump or Cruz, Reince Priebus and company better not try to rob them of the nomination.

Granny Bear Wrote:So, you like my sig?
nicker:

Loved it. :worthy: Just as funny as it is likely to be prophetic.

I borrowed that picture from Bob Seger!

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Granny, Kasich has no chance of winning the nomination, so it really makes no sense for anybody to endorse him at this point. Kasich is probably staying in the race and hoping for a contested convention, so that he can bargain for the No. 2 spot on somebody's ticket.

Kasich failed to turn in enough valid signatures to qualify for the Pennsylvania and Illinois ballots. A Rubio supporter filed a protest in Pennsylvania but did so at 5:13 PM on the filing deadline. Nobody protested his candidacy in Illinois, where he was hundreds of signatures short.

I will be very disappointed if Cruz agreed to be Trump's running mate. A Trump presidency would be a disaster for this country and being the VP for a dopey president will not help anybody's political career.

I told my family months ago that there is no way that Trump is ever going to agree to debate Cruz one-on-one and, sure enough, Trump is already talking about the debates being "boring" and stating that there have been enough debates already. He was clueless last night.

Somebody tweeted last night that anybody who was playing a drinking game where they had to take a drink whenever Trump said "deal" was probably already dead.

As bad as I believe a Trump presidency would be, if the establishment maneuvers to deny the nomination to anybody who wins a plurality of votes will set the Republican Party back decades, IMO. Voters will not unite behind Romney or anybody else who has not campaigned and won the most votes going into the convention. If the delegate leader is Trump or Cruz, Reince Priebus and company better not try to rob them of the nomination.

The debates are boring, and they remind me of arm wrestling contests at work or a bar somewhere. Invariably, when you take somebody down, they look all surprised and insist on doing it again. And inevitably they go down again. And it was not Trump who raised his voice in asking "how many debates are enough?" I had been hearing that idea kicked around for at least a week prior to his having mentioned it. But early on, the debates did serve a valuable purpose this time around.

For example, had it not been for Trump, Republicans would yet be groveling in fear of a direct question about any social issue whatever. The non-existent war on women, illegal immigrants, Radical Islamic psycho's who want to kill us, or any of the nauseatingly numerous layers of political correctness in general. For that alone, we owe Trump a debt of gratitude and our respect. And let us not forget, the sudden courage shown by the other candidates along those and other lines of dispute, was modeled first by Mr Trump for them to see and then to emulate.

From what I have seen from those who actually think for themselves and are not just another example of some think tank's pet parrot, there are as many credible supporters of Trump as there are detractors. I don't see how categorical predictions of doom can be attributable to a Trump Presidency at this point.

The plan to steal or otherwise scheme away a Trump nomination is as Hoot mentioned, no doubt extremely ill advised. These little columnists and media types from "The National Review," and the "We'll Tell You What to Think Magazine" will pay the ultimate price in the end. Readership will go the way of the dodo, along with any credibility as perceived by the public, or any respect I may have had for them. I mean, move over Glen Beck, cause company is a comin! The one's behind the attempt to disenfranchise the voters are the same bozo's who were too timid to make a peep when the Dems were steering this ship of state onto the rocks. I've learned my lesson you know, fool me once.

I would like to thank the Bernie rejects in Chicago tonight.
They caused an over exaggeration in the media that will surge Trump supporters to the polls.

I don't think they understand how this whole thing works. Millions of Americans sitting at home, listening to a calm Trump talk about it, while showing the vile vermin that are the thugs of Chicago cause havoc will ignite hope among supporters of Trump.

I like how the media blew up the one KKK nut job saying he liked Trump, lets see if they even come close to asking Bernie while his socialist followers are being so violent...

TheRealThing Wrote:The debates are boring, and they remind me of arm wrestling contests at work or a bar somewhere. Invariably, when you take somebody down, they look all surprised and insist on doing it again. And inevitably they go down again. And it was not Trump who raised his voice in asking "how many debates are enough?" I had been hearing that idea kicked around for at least a week prior to his having mentioned it. But early on, the debates did serve a valuable purpose this time around.

For example, had it not been for Trump, Republicans would yet be groveling in fear of a direct question about any social issue whatever. The non-existent war on women, illegal immigrants, Radical Islamic psycho's who want to kill us, or any of the nauseatingly numerous layers of political correctness in general. For that alone, we owe Trump a debt of gratitude and our respect. And let us not forget, the sudden courage shown by the other candidates along those and other lines of dispute, was modeled first by Mr Trump for them to see and then to emulate.

From what I have seen from those who actually think for themselves and are not just another example of some think tank's pet parrot, there are as many credible supporters of Trump as there are detractors. I don't see how categorical predictions of doom can be attributable to a Trump Presidency at this point.

The plan to steal or otherwise scheme away a Trump nomination is as Hoot mentioned, no doubt extremely ill advised. These little columnists and media types from "The National Review," and the "We'll Tell You What to Think Magazine" will pay the ultimate price in the end. Readership will go the way of the dodo, along with any credibility as perceived by the public, or any respect I may have had for them. I mean, move over Glen Beck, cause company is a comin! The one's behind the attempt to disenfranchise the voters are the same bozo's who were too timid to make a peep when the Dems were steering this ship of state onto the rocks. I've learned my lesson you know, fool me once.

I disagree. The debates have been boring only because Trump is so ignorant of issues that, until the last debate, he has relied on ad hominem attacks and hyperbole to hide that ignorance. Watching Trump in a debate is worse than watching the pre-shot clock North Carolina Tar Heels under Dean Smith execute its four-corner offense.

I despise the GOP establishment but the answer to RINOism is not electing a fascist to the White House. The only reason that Trump is leading this race is name recognition and the media's quest for ratings. Trump is the best argument against limits on campaign fund raising that there has ever been.

Entrenched incumbents in Congress have almost universal name recognition in their districts or states, which is the same advantage with which Trump began his campaign. As I have pointed out many times, Trump is not and has never been "self financed." He takes donations and has loaned his campaign millions of dollars. Those loans will be repaid by donors and he will finance his campaign in the general election campaign the same way that every other candidate will. In short, Trump is a lying hypocrite.

Trump is a Washington insider. He has financed mostly members of the liberal establishment for decades. There is no reason to expect that Trump will keep any of his campaign promises because he has always acted in his own selfish interests. People who have bought political influence in the past are no less corrupt than the people who have sold that influence. Not all people donate to politicians for personal gain, but Trump has boasted that his past donations were made as bribes for political favors.

I know that people in this country are angry at our corrupt federal government, but supporting one of the most corrupt Washington insiders to express that anger makes no sense. Trump has been a fraud in the business world and he has been a fraud in this campaign.

The Republican Party is in dire need of reform - a thorough house cleaning. Trump's goal is not to reform the party, but to destroy it. Rubio and Kasich are the status quo, establishment Republican candidates. Ted Cruz, in contrast, has fought to reform the party since he was first elected to office.

I am a proud member of the #NeverTrump movement and I remain unconvinced that Trump would make a better president than felon Hillary Clinton would. Slapping an "®" beside of his name does not make Hillary's dear friend, Donald Trump, any more presidential than she is.

[Image: 513917024-people-raise-their-arms-as-rep...large2.jpg]

RunItUpTheGut Wrote:I would like to thank the Bernie rejects in Chicago tonight.
They caused an over exaggeration in the media that will surge Trump supporters to the polls.

I don't think they understand how this whole thing works. Millions of Americans sitting at home, listening to a calm Trump talk about it, while showing the vile vermin that are the thugs of Chicago cause havoc will ignite hope among supporters of Trump.

I like how the media blew up the one KKK nut job saying he liked Trump, lets see if they even come close to asking Bernie while his socialist followers are being so violent...

White supremacist groups overwhelmingly support Trump and part of his appeal to them is his violent rhetoric. If anything, the media has downplayed Trump's appeal to the nut jobs.

If Trump was not in the race, the white supremacists would probably be supporting the most conservative candidate in the race, Ted Cruz, because of his tough stance against illegal immigration.

No candidate should be called upon to disavow his or her extremist supporters, unless they have actively sought that support.

That being said, Trump was lying when he blamed audio problems for his refusal to condemn David Duke and the KKK on a Sunday talk show a couple of weeks ago. His response made it clear that Trump understood the question, but did not want to offend any of his supporters just before an election. Trump handled an unfair question poorly and then lied about it.

I would just like to thank BLM, Sanders and his supporters and lying Ted for making Trumps numbers go up again, guess they just never learn. All last night accomplished was more votes for Trump and the mass exodus on Twitter by lying Teds supporters leaving him for his support of the thugs. Again Thanks to all those mentioned.

^^ Crap almost forgot one. Also Thank Obamas domestic terrorist friend David Ayers also, he was there supporting the "Protest"..

Demarcus ware Wrote:I would just like to thank BLM, Sanders and his supporters and lying Ted for making Trumps numbers go up again, guess they just never learn. All last night accomplished was more votes for Trump and the mass exodus on Twitter by lying Teds supporters leaving him for his support of the thugs. Again Thanks to all those mentioned.

Can you list Cruz's lies without quoting Donald Trump? If Trump is the nominee, he will lose to Hillary, unless she is indicted. In fact, he may lose to Hillary even if she is indicted because millions of Republican voters will not, under any circumstance, vote for Donald Trump. Trump is a cowardly thug. (Hopefully, Trump will not sue me for saying so, but truth is an absolute defense.)

Demarcus ware Wrote:I would just like to thank BLM, Sanders and his supporters and lying Ted for making Trumps numbers go up again, guess they just never learn. All last night accomplished was more votes for Trump and the mass exodus on Twitter by lying Teds supporters leaving him for his support of the thugs. Again Thanks to all those mentioned.

Lying Ted? It's scary to see the influence that Donald Trump has on his supporters and it's also frightening to see how quickly he turns on someone who goes against him in the least bit. Some of the people voting for Trump would have probably been for Cruz originally due to his stance on immigration, but Trump has been a better talker. Ted Cruz is far from perfect, but one thing he has done is he has taken a strong stand for conservative principles regardless of how popular or unpopular his stances are. Whether it's on the immigration as he stood up to the gang of eight, stood up against Obamacare while McConnell and others were begging him to stop, or taking a stand for people like Kim Davis when Trump did not (despite saying via Twitter he would be the best representative Christians have had in a long time) Cruz has been consistent. Show me where Donald Trump has been consistent. The only thing Trump has done is that he has been a great talker. When you get outside the issue of immigration, he's more of a moderate.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Can you list Cruz's lies without quoting Donald Trump? If Trump is the nominee, he will lose to Hillary, unless she is indicted. In fact, he may lose to Hillary even if she is indicted because millions of Republican voters will not, under any circumstance, vote for Donald Trump. Trump is a cowardly thug. (Hopefully, Trump will not sue me for saying so, but truth is an absolute defense.)

Sure as soon as I get home off the road I'll give you plenty that didn't come from Donald trump.

WideRight05 Wrote:Lying Ted? It's scary to see the influence that Donald Trump has on his supporters and it's also frightening to see how quickly he turns on someone who goes against him in the least bit. Some of the people voting for Trump would have probably been for Cruz originally due to his stance on immigration, but Trump has been a better talker. Ted Cruz is far from perfect, but one thing he has done is he has taken a strong stand for conservative principles regardless of how popular or unpopular his stances are. Whether it's on the immigration as he stood up to the gang of eight, stood up against Obamacare while McConnell and others were begging him to stop, or taking a stand for people like Kim Davis when Trump did not (despite saying via Twitter he would be the best representative Christians have had in a long time) Cruz has been consistent. Show me where Donald Trump has been consistent. The only thing Trump has done is that he has been a great talker. When you get outside the issue of immigration, he's more of a moderate.

Sorry you lost me at Kim Davis. She's such a hypocrite and anyone that cites her is just using her hypocrisy for their own agenda. While I do oppose gay marriage, using her and her history is a joke. Maybe we should use the pastor that introduced Ted the other day calling for the killings of gays. Such a nice Christian man.

Demarcus ware Wrote:^^ Crap almost forgot one. Also Thank Obamas domestic terrorist friend David Ayers also, he was there supporting the "Protest"..

Well, you half-remembered. Ayers' first name is Bill. Cruz never defended the "protesters," but Trump's talk of punching protesters in the face and lamenting that in the good ole days they would have been carried off on stretchers is not presidential.

National polls have consistently shown Cruz thrashing Trump in a one-on-one race. The trouble is there are three Republicans splitting votes against one Democrat and the Democrat is thriving in open Republicans primaries.

Demarcus ware Wrote:Sorry you lost me at Kim Davis. She's such a hypocrite and anyone that cites her is just using her hypocrisy for their own agenda. While I do oppose gay marriage, using her and her history is a joke. Maybe we should use the pastor that introduced Ted the other day calling for the killings of gays. Such a nice Christian man.

You missed the point entirely and quite frankly, I am not going to waste my time on you because like many of Trump's supporters (or better yet, Obama's as well) you have fell for the kool-aid and it has blocked your ability to think rationally. My point was about Cruz's consistency and you attempted to change the topic to Kim Davis. When you mentioned a joke the first thing that came to mind was Harlan County football, but I forgot that Trump didn't take a stand for Kim Davis either, so that's right - you have to follow the master's line of thinking.

You criticize Cruz for the pastor he associates himself with but think the people Trump associates himself with are innocent? Ha! :lmao:

WideRight05 Wrote:You missed the point entirely and quite frankly, I am not going to waste my time on you because like many of Trump's supporters (or better yet, Obama's as well) you have fell for the kool-aid and it has blocked your ability to think rationally. My point was about Cruz's consistency and you attempted to change the topic to Kim Davis. When you mentioned a joke the first thing that came to mind was Harlan County football, but I forgot that Trump didn't take a stand for Kim Davis either, so that's right - you have to follow the master's line of thinking.

You criticize Cruz for the pastor he associates himself with but think the people Trump associates himself with are innocent? Ha! :lmao:

Calling out Harlan county football does nothing to me but good try. As for Davis I thought that even before I supported Trump so again, good try. You brought up Kim Davis and when I said she was a joke which she is, you want to say you're not wasting your time. Ha!! Doesn't matter to me one way or the other. As for Ted and his minions good luck finishing second or maybe worse now that his supporters are jumping ship nicker: and for the record can you show me which post I said the people Trump associates himself with are innocent? Oh you can't? Because I never said that, in fact on Twitter I've done just the opposite but like Cruz you are just making it up as you go along.

Demarcus ware Wrote:Calling out Harlan county football does nothing to me but good try. As for Davis I thought that even before I supported Trump so again, good try. You brought up Kim Davis and when I said she was a joke which she is, you want to say you're not wasting your time. Ha!! Doesn't matter to me one way or the other. As for Ted and his minions good luck finishing second or maybe worse now that his supporters are jumping ship nicker: and for the record can you show me which post I said the people Trump associates himself with are innocent? Oh you can't? Because I never said that, in fact on Twitter I've done just the opposite but like Cruz you are just making it up as you go along.

Cruz's stand for Kim Davis was brought up as an example of his consistency, but you managed to change the topic to something else has Trump has done so many times. You dodged the points I made about Cruz being consistent and slipped the topic onto Kim Davis. You never did prove me wrong about his consistency. Like Trump and all of the other politicians Cruz has twisted the words of his opponents trying to gain an advantage, but at least he has a proven, consistent record.

Do you think I actually care that Cruz is trailing Trump is the polls and could finish second? Our society is quickly going to waste, regardless of who the president is. Similar to your master, you love to gloat about the polls, but that's the only thing you know to say. Trump has been able to insult and provoke his way to the top of the polls instead of taking a strong stand while using substantive arguments. It's yet another great indicator of how far our society has fallen. You make a great poster boy for Trump's supporters.

Lastly, you managed to try to twist my words again when it comes to who Trump associates himself with. I didn't say anything about what you said in the past. You were very quick to criticize Cruz for a pastor he associated with, so why not hold Trump to the same standard for people he has associated himself with?

Waiting to see how you're going to twist my words again. :hilarious:

WideRight05 Wrote:You missed the point entirely and quite frankly, I am not going to waste my time on you because like many of Trump's supporters (or better yet, Obama's as well) you have fell for the kool-aid and it has blocked your ability to think rationally. My point was about Cruz's consistency and you attempted to change the topic to Kim Davis. When you mentioned a joke the first thing that came to mind was Harlan County football, but I forgot that Trump didn't take a stand for Kim Davis either, so that's right - you have to follow the master's line of thinking.

You criticize Cruz for the pastor he associates himself with but think the people Trump associates himself with are innocent? Ha! :lmao:

As with so many issues, Trump was against Kim Davis's position before he was for it. Trump could teach John Kerry a thing or two about flip-flopping. Anybody who has ever had the misfortune of having to work with a pathological liar would recognize the problem with giving the power of the presidency to a scoundrel like Donald Trump.

I doubt that a day goes by when Trump does not falsely claim to be self financing his campaign. The FEC filings by candidates are not that complicated. Anybody with a high school diploma should be able to figure out that he is lying every time that he makes that claim.

I caught some of Trump's rally this morning and he is back to hurling personal insults like "Little Marco" and "Lyen' Ted" (Trump's spelling, not mine). He is the most ignorant presidential candidate that I have ever seen, and that includes John Edwards and John Kerry. Trump may be marginally more knowledgeable about how our federal government than his friend and former presidential candidate, Al Sharpton, but it is a close call.

If I were a Trump supporter, I would have stopped watching the debates long ago, because watching him ramble like a moron would be painful. Watching him match wits with Rubio and Cruz makes me wince. Trump in a debate is like watching the Michael Scott character on The Office. The character is funny but he thinks people are laughing with him, when in reality they are laughing at him.

Putting a reality TV star into the White House is a really, really bad idea.

I maybe be the biggest dumb :moon: But Donald Trump is crazy, Ted Cruz is a snake handlers, Marco Rubio is a puppet, Kasich maybe the closest thing to a real Republican. Bernnie Sanders ( I'm not buying into the Bern ) Hillary Clinton I have never voted for her. If it come down to Hillary and Kasich I promise I will drive to Harlan County meet up with Granny Bear, Demarcus Ware and flipped a coin. Who I vote for :truestory: But I will not flipped for Trump,Rubio, Bernie and Cruz. Another :truestory:

Cruz is now hemorrhaging voters and now endorsements for siding with the protestors last night. Better get on the TrumpTrain while there is room nicker:

Demarcus ware Wrote:Cruz is now hemorrhaging voters and now endorsements for siding with the protestors last night. Better get on the TrumpTrain while there is room nicker:

You dodged my point again! Did TheRealVille hack your account? :lmao:

WideRight05 Wrote:You dodged my point again! Did TheRealVille hack your account? :lmao:

TheRealThing is protesting somewhere today......I Think :Cheerlead

WideRight05 Wrote:Cruz's stand for Kim Davis was brought up as an example of his consistency, but you managed to change the topic to something else has Trump has done so many times. You dodged the points I made about Cruz being consistent and slipped the topic onto Kim Davis. You never did prove me wrong about his consistency. Like Trump and all of the other politicians Cruz has twisted the words of his opponents trying to gain an advantage, but at least he has a proven, consistent record.

Do you think I actually care that Cruz is trailing Trump is the polls and could finish second? Our society is quickly going to waste, regardless of who the president is. Similar to your master, you love to gloat about the polls, but that's the only thing you know to say. Trump has been able to insult and provoke his way to the top of the polls instead of taking a strong stand while using substantive arguments. It's yet another great indicator of how far our society has fallen. You make a great poster boy for Trump's supporters.

Lastly, you managed to try to twist my words again when it comes to who Trump associates himself with. I didn't say anything about what you said in the past. You were very quick to criticize Cruz for a pastor he associated with, so why not hold Trump to the same standard for people he has associated himself with?

Waiting to see how you're going to twist my words again. :hilarious:

Not twisting your words at all. Just going by what you are saying. How do you know I don't condemn some of Trumps associates? You don't. You made an assumption and you were wrong. Just like thinking I care about polls. Wrong again. I care about results not polls. For someone not wasting their time you sure are doing a lot of it. It really is this simple to me, I support who I want too support and you support whomever you want. I said 6 months ago none of these candidates are worthy of being president, look it up if you so desire but over the course I made up my mind who I think will bring the economy back and who I think will take care of the immigration problem. I believe it will be Trump, you are free to believe whatever you like. I just get on here for fun because of all the whining. Also, I'm not ready for one term senators who hasn't really accomplished that much. If they had, they would be running on that. We've had that type of person for the last 7 years. Also just an FYI, when you want to insult me, using HC football won't do it, I haven't lived there for several years now.