Bluegrassrivals

Wildcatk23 Wrote:About 2 minutes,

It took you 2 minutes. Those guys at MoveOn.org and MediaMatters have hacks that get paid to package the propaganda that you so eagerly regurgitate. You are nothing but an Obama echo. nicker:

Wildcatk23 Wrote:About 2 minutes,

[Image: bush-saudi-hand-holding-1.jpg?w=500]

[Image: bush-saudi-kiss.jpg?w=500]

[Image: bow-eisenhower.jpg?w=500&h=337]

[Image: bow-nixon-1.jpg?w=500&h=345]

We are not talking about a nod here, which is just a token of respect. A deep bow from the waist (Obama style) as when a dog bows before his master.

TheRealThing Wrote:We are not talking about a nod here, which is just a token of respect. A deep bow from the waist (Obama style) as when a dog bows before his master.

Tomato, potato, it is all the same to an Obama fanboy.

WideRight05 Wrote:Good photo Junior!!! For once in your life you've made a smart decision. :Thumbs: Notice that in this picture, Bush is receiving an honor from them...Obama? He is the one doing the "honoring."

Yes ITs a great Honor to receive a Medal from from a guy that its disgraceful to bow to?

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Tomato, potato, it is all the same to an Obama fanboy.

I know, and they try so hard.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:It took you 2 minutes. Those guys at MoveOn.org and MediaMatters have hacks that get paid to package the propaganda that you so eagerly regurgitate. You are nothing but an Obama echo. nicker:

Does it really matter? IF you dont like the president, just move. You got the cash.

[Image: FOUR-MORE-YEARS-PIC.jpg]

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Yes ITs a great Honor to receive a Medal from from a guy that its disgraceful to bow to?

LOL, what do you want Bush to do? Bow down to him? Get on his knees like Obama would?

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Yes ITs a great Honor to receive a Medal from from a guy that its disgraceful to bow to?

It is disgraceful for the U.S. president to bow to any member of a royalty family. The founders of this country fought a war so that Americans would never again bow to a king. All Obama needs is a tin horn dictator and down he goes!

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Yes ITs a great Honor to receive a Medal from from a guy that its disgraceful to bow to?

Whether or not it is proper protocol to bow before a foreign leader is not in question, nor has it ever been in question since the birth of our land. Presidents of the United States show respect to all the leaders of the world, that doesn't include the ultimate gesture of subservience, which is to bow at the waist. You think a sitting president should bow before the leader of another land?

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Does it really matter? IF you dont like the president, just move. You got the cash.

[Image: FOUR-MORE-YEARS-PIC.jpg]

"The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the Nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right. Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else."

Teddy Roosevelt

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Does it really matter? IF you dont like the president, just move. You got the cash.

I will be here when this president leaves office but my conscience will be clear. Your generation is responsible for putting this abomination into office - twice.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:I will be here when this president leaves office but my conscience will be clear. Your generation is responsible for putting this abomination into office - twice.

Your Generation Voted in 2 terms of bush. :flush:

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Your Generation Voted in 2 terms of bush. :flush:

Blame Bush, Blame Bush, Blame Bush....

Bush wasn't as bad as you would like him to be Junior. Shows how media-fed you are...

Where do we find some of these moderators? LOL

WideRight05 Wrote:Blame Bush, Blame Bush, Blame Bush....

Bush wasn't as bad as you would like him to be Junior. Shows how media-fed you are...

Where do we find some of these moderators? LOL

Tell that to the Iraqi Vets.
The Economic Collapse.

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Your Generation Voted in 2 terms of bush. :flush:

Under Obama, this country has seen levels of poverty not matched since the Great Depression. A record number of Americans will use food stamps to buy food for their Thanksgiving dinners this week. When the next recession hits next year, are you still going to be blaming Bush for Obama's declining economy? That's a rhetorical answer - of course you are, you don't know any better.

Hoot Gibson Wrote:Under Obama, this country has seen levels of poverty not matched since the Great Depression. A record number of Americans will use food stamps to buy food for their Thanksgiving dinners this week. When the next recession hits next year, are you still going to be blaming Bush for Obama's declining economy? That's a rhetorical answer - of course you are, you don't know any better.

Answer something for me hoot.

How was the economy when Bush took over?
How was it when he left?
DO we really want to return to his economic plans?

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Tell that to the Iraqi Vets.
The Economic Collapse.

If you think the most of the Iraqi vets feel the same way you do about Bush, you're dead wrong. Bush at least acknowledged them and treated them like human beings. Not to mention, they know more about what is going on...I think I would trust their viewpoints.

The economic collapse? Like I have said numerous times on here, you can only blame Bush for so much. Under Obama we now have 47 million people on food stamps. If they were a country, they would be the 26th largest country in the world! Bush's final budget ended in October 2009. What has happened to the debt since then Junior? It hasn't slowed down, it hasn't improved, it's worse!

:hilarious:

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Answer something for me hoot.

How was the economy when Bush took over?
How was it when he left?
DO we really want to return to his economic plans?

This is just pure stupidity. You think every republican that comes in is going to be like George Bush and implement the same policies he did? If you took the time and studied this, you would find that their is a HUGE difference between George Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney, the latter two moderates. See, this shows how media-fed you are. The media wants to place everybody who runs from the republican side on the issues and feed it in your little brain that they are going to be "another Bush." Sadly, with people like you, it works.

What about Ronald Reagan? I guess since you don't like Bush, then Reagan's policies didn't work either since he's a republican?

WideRight05 Wrote:If you think the most of the Iraqi vets feel the same way you do about Bush, you're dead wrong. Bush at least acknowledged them and treated them like human beings. Not to mention, they know more about what is going on...I think I would trust their viewpoints.

The economic collapse? Like I have said numerous times on here, you can only blame Bush for so much. Under Obama we now have 47 million people on food stamps. If they were a country, they would be the 26th largest country in the world! Bush's final budget ended in October 2009. What has happened to the debt since then Junior? It hasn't slowed down, it hasn't improved, it's worse!

:hilarious:

I agree with the troops being for bush.


I love how you put a question mark after the Economic collapse like it didnt happen.

WideRight05 Wrote:This is just pure stupidity. You think every republican that comes in is going to be like George Bush and implement the same policies he did? If you took the time and studied this, you would find that their is a HUGE difference between George Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney, the latter two moderates. See, this shows how media-fed you are. The media wants to place everybody who runs from the republican side on the issues and feed it in your little brain that they are going to be "another Bush." Sadly, with people like you, it works.

What about Ronald Reagan? I guess since you don't like Bush, then Reagan's policies didn't work either since he's a republican?

Thanks for answering the questions.

:thanks:

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Answer something for me hoot.

How was the economy when Bush took over?
How was it when he left?
DO we really want to return to his economic plans?

LOL, I mean I know Bush was a pilot in the Air National Guard and all but, I didn't know he was the one who flew those jumbo jets through the World Trade Centers. That little deal cost the American taxpayer 3 trillion. Otherwise, things would have been much better when '08 rolled around. You take 3 trillion off the top of the debt W. rang up, which was only 5 trillion and W's debt would have been 2 trillion for 8 years. That's an average of 250 billion for each year of his presidency.

WideRight05 Wrote:If you think the most of the Iraqi vets feel the same way you do about Bush, you're dead wrong. Bush at least acknowledged them and treated them like human beings. Not to mention, they know more about what is going on...I think I would trust their viewpoints.

The economic collapse? Like I have said numerous times on here, you can only blame Bush for so much. Under Obama we now have 47 million people on food stamps. If they were a country, they would be the 26th largest country in the world! Bush's final budget ended in October 2009. What has happened to the debt since then Junior? It hasn't slowed down, it hasn't improved, it's worse!

:hilarious:

Make that an updated 50 million

Wildcatk23 Wrote:Answer something for me hoot.

How was the economy when Bush took over?
How was it when he left?
DO we really want to return to his economic plans?

How was the economy when Obama took over? How was it after he ran up the debt by $6 trillion in less than 4 years? Has the unemployment rate risen or fallen since Obama took office? Are there more or are there fewer people in the workforce than when Obama took office? Are there more or are there fewer people now on food stamps than when Obama took office? Have more people found jobs since Obama took office, or have more begun receiving disability payments?

Obama's economic plan is socialism. He has no interest in seeing people return to work in good paying jobs. Poor people vote for Obama and other liberal Democrats in droves. The more people who are dependent on the government and the more poorly educated they are, the more they vote for liberal politicians. You can look at the inner cities around the country and see the economic miracles that liberal Democrats have performed over the past few decades.

TheRealThing Wrote:Hey, lighten up guys. Our pres can say "Pochistan." He's up on all the arab stuff, you can't expect him to spend precious time familarizing himself with the names of his guests while on Air Force Obama now can you?

That's the correct way to say Pakistan, btw.

TheRealThing Wrote:Make that an updated 50 million

I am behind the times. Sad to see how many people "can't work." LOL! That also makes one out of six Americans on welfare. So that means, out of all of us that have posted in this thread...one is a mooches. nicker:

Wildcatk23 Wrote:I agree with the troops being for bush.


I love how you put a question mark after the Economic collapse like it didnt happen.

Of course, a childish tactic to dismiss everything I said. The economy in 2008 looks like heaven compared to the economy now. Four years, no improvement, and all you can come up with is excuses to blame bush?

WideRight05 Wrote:This is just pure stupidity. You think every republican that comes in is going to be like George Bush and implement the same policies he did? If you took the time and studied this, you would find that their is a HUGE difference between George Bush, John McCain, and Mitt Romney, the latter two moderates. See, this shows how media-fed you are. The media wants to place everybody who runs from the republican side on the issues and feed it in your little brain that they are going to be "another Bush." Sadly, with people like you, it works.

What about Ronald Reagan? I guess since you don't like Bush, then Reagan's policies didn't work either since he's a republican?

LOL, Sen. McCain is NOT a Moderate...

vundy33 Wrote:LOL, Sen. McCain is NOT a Moderate...

He's far less conservative than Bush. What do you label him as then?

Hoot Gibson Wrote:How was the economy when Obama took over? How was it after he ran up the debt by $6 trillion in less than 4 years? Has the unemployment rate risen or fallen since Obama took office? Are there more or are there fewer people in the workforce than when Obama took office? Are there more or are there fewer people now on food stamps than when Obama took office? Have more people found jobs since Obama took office, or have more begun receiving disability payments?

Obama's economic plan is socialism. He has no interest in seeing people return to work in good paying jobs. Poor people vote for Obama and other liberal Democrats in droves. The more people who are dependent on the government and the more poorly educated they are, the more they vote for liberal politicians. You can look at the inner cities around the country and see the economic miracles that liberal Democrats have performed over the past few decades.

I really do see your point but I keep bouncing back to an article I read back in June of 2010---

Obama gives nearly half a billion dollars to terror organization HAMAS

Washington (CNN) - The United States will contribute $400 million in development aid to the Palestinian territories and work with Israel to loosen its embargo on Gaza, President Barack Obama said Wednesday. Obama's announcement came after White House talks with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas. The money will be used to build housing, schools, water and health care systems in both the Palestinian Authority-controlled West Bank and Gaza, which is ruled by the Palestinian Islamic movement Hamas. Obama called the situation in Gaza "unsustainable," and said the United States would work with its European allies, Egypt and Israel to find a "new conceptual framework" for the Israeli blockade of Gaza." source - CNN

President Obama is making it a centerpiece of his administration to solve the Iranian nuke crisis to give Israeli land to the palestinians for a creation of their soon-to-be-announced state of Palestine. Towards that end he, last week, upgraded the status of the PLO embassy to 'delegate general'.

This means that the PLO, a terrorist organization, now has rights normally given to actual nations representatives like diplomatic immunity and the right to fly thier flag over their embassy in Washington. White House spokesman Thomas Vietor said this about the move -

"When asked to comment on the move, White House spokesman Thomas Vietor said, "This decision reflects our confidence that through direct negotiations, we can help achieve a two-state solution with an independent and viable Palestine living side by side with Israel. We should begin preparing for that outcome now, as we continue to work with the Palestinian people on behalf of a better future."
source - JPost.com

I can tell you without a doubt that one of the biggest rubs between Netanyahu and Obama is the pressure Obama is putting on Israel to accept the "two state solution", which of course, is the plan to divide Israel. Netanyahu will never allow that to happen. So, walk like a duck, talk like a Muslim. IDK

vundy33 Wrote:LOL, Sen. McCain is NOT a Moderate...

If he is not a moderate, then he is a liberal. McCain is NOT a conservative. He was a very unpopular choice for the nomination among conservatives. McCain won the nomination because he received so many independent and Democratic votes in the early open primaries, which Giulianni's people were responsible for putting in place. When Rudy blew a bunch of money in Florida and ran poorly in the Northeast, McCain became the moderate candidate by default, as several conservative candidates split the votes of the opposition.

Huckabee stayed in the race after it was clear that he had no shot at the nomination to draw votes away from Romney in the South. The fact that Romney was stronger in the South than McCain should tell you that McCain is not considered a conservative by conservatives.

Recall that it was McCain, with fellow moderate Lindsey Graham, who put together the Gang of 14, which cut off his own Majority Leader in the Senate at the knees. Hastert was threatening to change the filibuster rules to get more conservative judges floor votes in the Senate and McCain joined with moderate Democrats to stab him in the back.