Last week I posted the results of the latest Rassmussen Poll and it was scoffed at for being a poll of conservative bias and is was quoted by several that it could not match the correctness of the most accurate poll on the planet. That being the Gallup poll.
Well since the Gallup is so highly touted by several from the liberal point of view, I thought I would help them battle their case with the latest results from the folks over at the Gallup plantation.
Here ya go boys, "read em and weep". This is your poll of choice.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...Obama.html
I'm sure that the Gallup will now be nothing more than a bogus piece of conservative talk point garbage too.:popcorn:
Seger, you have to remember certain people on this site when you post these things.
nicker:
![[Image: caution+offended.jpg]](https://lh6.googleusercontent.com/-AIveizM-Z0k/TYj-xZuEXwI/AAAAAAAAFjQ/H_9jTKHqj_M/caution+offended.jpg)
Just wait till the folks find out that this adminstration had been warned that foreign embassies were under threat some three days prior to the attacks and resultant American deaths on 9/11. I mean how many different ways are there to drop the ball anyway? These guys are truly clueless. Oh the limitless faith the liberal has in the brotherhood of man. I bet Nancy Pelosi and Barack were shocked! Truly it is Amature Hour at the White House.
^ I'm waiting for it to unfold. It wouldn't surprise me.
The question is, would the mainstream media report it?
WideRight05 Wrote:^ I'm waiting for it to unfold. It wouldn't surprise me.
The question is, would the mainstream media report it?
They certainly were all over Romney's 47% comments about 3AM this morning on the CBS Early Morning News. I just happened to wake up for some reason about that time with the TV on, and they were absolutely roasting Romney. You all might remember the media conspiracy against Romney last week when the press ganged up on him after his comments concerning the Libyan Embassy Massacre. Well the reporter who the most vocal in the setup is CBS's Jan Crawford. Guess who was doing the reporting and the condeming on this incident last night? Yep you guessed it.
But to answer your question.....Not a chance.
Bob Seger Wrote:They certainly were all over Romney's 47% comments about 3AM this morning on the CBS Early Morning News. I just happened to wake up for some reason about that time with the TV on, and they were absolutely roasting Romney. You all might remember the media conspiracy against Romney last week when the press ganged up on him after his comments concerning the Libyan Embassy Massacre. Well the reporter who the most vocal in the setup is CBS's Jan Crawford. Guess who was doing the reporting and the condeming on this incident last night? Yep you guessed it.
But to answer your question.....Not a chance.
Well, if they had any shame, character or conscience, they would have to quit and get a real job. Creating news for a political party is the stuff of treason.
TheRealThing Wrote:Well, if they had any shame, character or conscience, they would have to quit and get a real job. Creating news for a political party is the stuff of treason.
"I try to help you guys out in this career path you've chosen that's one or two steps above prostitution." - Bob knight to the media in a press conference
Does anybody else wanna take Lawrence Odonnelle and kick him right in the nuts? Or is it just me?
WideRight05 Wrote:^ I'm waiting for it to unfold. It wouldn't surprise me.
The question is, would the mainstream media report it?
If it portrays Obama in a negative light, no way. A snowball's chance in hell any of the major networks run anything less than glowing reports about their golden boy.
Any semblance of objective reporting of the news went out the door a long time ago.
RunItUpTheGut Wrote:Does anybody else wanna take Lawrence Odonnelle and kick him right in the nuts? Or is it just me?
It's just you. Too small of a target.
More Cowbell Wrote:If it portrays Obama in a negative light, no way. A snowball's chance in hell any of the major networks run anything less than glowing reports about their golden boy.
Any semblance of objective reporting of the news went out the door a long time ago.
Be careful. You used the phrase "snowball's chance in hell". Since snowballs are white, you must be a racist using code words for all the other racists who don't support Barry solely because he is half black. After all, according to the media, no one could or should question his socialist policies.
Truth Wrote:Be careful. You used the phrase "snowball's chance in hell". Since snowballs are white, you must be a racist using code words for all the other racists who don't support Barry solely because he is half black. After all, according to the media, no one could or should question his socialist policies.
What if it was a yellow snowball? You know, I've got a lot of wild animals living around my house... :biggrin:
More Cowbell Wrote:What if it was a yellow snowball? You know, I've got a lot of wild animals living around my house... :biggrin:
According to Frank Zappa, that's the kind that makes you go blind! :biggrin:
TheRealVille Wrote:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/...e_map.html
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2012/ecalcul...ttleground
What a total load of baloney. I served too and so have millions of others. Anybody who has as many as two brain cells that have said "howdy" lately, knows it's Barack Obama who has the US military budget on the chopping block. What are they calling it, "sequestration?" Heck, dems have
always put a strangle hold on the US military, I know Clinton didn't hesitate. That's why the military vote always hurts the democratic nominee, soldiers and sailors always vote republican because republicans try to take care of our armed services. Not use them for a cash cow like the dems do.
Sequestration, when translated, means something like this; Since the dems refuse to allow any cuts to a US fiscal spending policy which, more resembles a freight train going down a mountain without breaks, than a fiscally responsible super power and, since the republicans won't play along with our mad scheme. We are therefore going to hold our armed services hostage, in order to force republican compliance toward that end. So that if the Super(not) Committee doesn't agree to spending cuts, (how could they, Obama placed 'ringers' on the committee to make sure that couldn't happen), we (dems) will raid the national defense fund like we did the Medicare fund to pay for ObamaCare.
Wildcatk23 Wrote:http://content.usatoday.com/communities/...Ftsube9Kc1
Reagan was down to Carter 39% to 47% at this same time in that election. We all know how that turned out. By coincidence, 47 is the number of days Obama has left before he adds another Lame catagory to his replete repertoire, and that would be the infamous lame duck, LOL. :rockon:
TheRealThing Wrote:What a total load of baloney. I served too and so have millions of others. Anybody who has as many as two brain cells that have said "howdy" lately, knows it's Barack Obama who has the US military budget on the chopping block. What are they calling it, "sequestration?" Heck, dems have always put a strangle hold on the US military, I know Clinton didn't hesitate. That's why the military vote always hurts the democratic nominee, soldiers and sailors always vote republican because republicans try to take care of our armed services. Not use them for a cash cow like the dems do.
Sequestration, when translated, means something like this; Since the dems refuse to allow any cuts to a US fiscal spending policy which, more resembles a freight train going down a mountain without breaks, than a fiscally responsible super power and, since the republicans won't play along with our mad scheme. We are therefore going to hold our armed services hostage, in order to force republican compliance toward that end. So that if the Super(not) Committee doesn't agree to spending cuts, (how could they, Obama placed 'ringers' on the committee to make sure that couldn't happen), we (dems) will raid the national defense fund like we did the Medicare fund to pay for ObamaCare.
What the hell are you talking about? Those are electoral college maps.
TheRealVille Wrote:What the hell are you talking about? Those are electoral college maps.
LOL, your signature. Thought I called that out.