Bluegrassrivals

Full Version: Tentative NBA Deal Reached For CBA
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
NEW YORK -- NBA owners and players reached a tentative agreement early Saturday to end the 149-day lockout.

After a secret meeting earlier this week, the sides met for more than 15 hours Friday, working to try to save the season. This handshake deal, however, still must be ratified by both owners and players.

"We've reached a tentative understanding that is subject to a variety of approvals and very complex machinations, but we're optimistic that will all come to pass and that the NBA season will begin Dec. 25," Commissioner David Stern said.

The league plans a 66-game season and aims to open camps Dec. 9.
"We thought it was in both of our best interests to try to reach a resolution and save the game," union executive director Billy Hunter said.

The Christmas Day deadline created a sense of urgency because that schedule is traditionally a showcase for the league. This season's three-game slate was to include Miami at Dallas in an NBA finals rematch, plus MVP Derrick Rose leading Chicago into Los Angeles to face Kobe Bryant and the Lakers.

A majority on each side is needed to approve the agreement. The NBA needs votes from 15 of 29 owners. (The league owns the New Orleans Hornets.) Stern said the labor committee plans to discuss the agreement later Saturday and expects them to endorse it and recommend to the full board.

The union needs a simple majority of its 430-plus members. That process is a bit more complicated after the players dissolved the union Nov. 14. Now, they must drop their antitrust lawsuit in Minnesota and reform the union before voting on the deal.

Because the union disbanded, a new collective bargaining agreement can only be completed once the union has reformed. Drug testing and other issues still must be negotiated between the league and the players.

The settlement first was reported by CBSSports.com.

When last talks broke down, the sides were still divided over the division of revenues and certain changes sought by owners to curb spending by big-market teams that players felt would limit or restrict their options in free agency.

On Nov. 14, players rejected the owners' proposal, which included opening a 72-game schedule on Dec. 15, announcing instead they were disbanding the union, giving them a chance to win several billion dollars in triple damages in an antitrust lawsuit.

Two days later, players filed two separate antitrust lawsuits against the league in two different states. On Monday, a group of named plaintiffs including Carmelo Anthony, Steve Nash and Kevin Durant filed an amended federal lawsuit against the league in Minnesota, hoping the courts there will be as favorable to them as they have been to NFL players in the past.

Now, players will dismiss that lawsuit and get back to the business of basketball.

The previous CBA expired at the end of the day June 30. Despite a series of meetings in June, there was never much hope of a deal before that deadline, with owners wanting significant changes after saying they lost $300 million last season and hundreds of millions more in each year of the old agreement, which was ratified in 2005.

Owners wanted to keep more of the league's nearly $4 billion in basketball revenues to themselves after guaranteeing 57 percent to the players under the old deal. And they sought a system where even the smallest-market clubs could compete, believing the current system would always favor the teams who could spend the most.

Initially, the salary cap emerged as the biggest obstacle. Owners first proposed a hard cap, but players fought hard to maintain the current system that allows teams to exceed the cap through the use of various exceptions.

The league was adamant the system needed some adjustment, because the old rules gave too many advantages to teams who could afford to keep adding to their payrolls. So the league's proposals targeted the highest-spending teams, seeking to eliminate the use of the midlevel exception by teams over the luxury tax and prevent them from participating in sign-and-trade deals.

http://espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/728105...-agreement
Looks like it finally may be coming to and end.
It appears it will be a 66 game season starting on christmas day...
Alright, I said I don't start watching NBA until Christmas, I have gotten my wish!!!
^ Yeah I don't start watching until Jan so I didn't miss anything..
It's about damn time. Won't be watching this year though.
This will make poor ole Ballers day!
^ Hope so
Alright!
part of the deal is that College Players has to stay 2 Years in College before leaving for the Pros, so this could really work in Kentucky's favor and that will impact this year's class, meaning Teague, Kidd-Gilchrist and all them will be back next season
^That's awesome!!!
If players do have to stay to years than they should give us knight back before he ever plays his first game with the pistons lol.

Seriously though, can you imagine what would happen if everyone returns next year besides miller whos graduating.
Strikeout King Wrote:part of the deal is that College Players has to stay 2 Years in College before leaving for the Pros, so this could really work in Kentucky's favor and that will impact this year's class, meaning Teague, Kidd-Gilchrist and all them will be back next season

This is the only good thing about it..lol.
we have to sit though another damn NBA season. they should miss the season and go to the playoffs.
It would suck to be an NBA player that's playing professionally in China right now. Can't back out of those contracts
Strikeout King Wrote:part of the deal is that College Players has to stay 2 Years in College before leaving for the Pros, so this could really work in Kentucky's favor and that will impact this year's class, meaning Teague, Kidd-Gilchrist and all them will be back next season

BUT!!!! Will the best players keep coming to UK? The best players want to PLAY. And that is what has made UK so attractive. The best recruiting classes for three straight years, hands down, has really been due to these kids coming with an expectation of playing their ONE year and then heading off to the NBA. If they are now required to play two years, then these kids are going to start going someplace that they will start for TWO years. Will the best PG in the nation come to UK next year if Teague is here? Nope! He's going where he will start NEXT year. So yes, this has a great affect on UK for the next two years IF, this rule is put in place.

To my knowledge, this has not been agreed upon by the Players Association. How much influence do agents have in the Players Association? Agents certainly won't be for this rule and they will do all they can to ensure it does not get passed.
Strikeout King Wrote:part of the deal is that College Players has to stay 2 Years in College before leaving for the Pros, so this could really work in Kentucky's favor and that will impact this year's class, meaning Teague, Kidd-Gilchrist and all them will be back next season

:flame:
Stardust Wrote:BUT!!!! Will the best players keep coming to UK? The best players want to PLAY. And that is what has made UK so attractive. The best recruiting classes for three straight years, hands down, has really been due to these kids coming with an expectation of playing their ONE year and then heading off to the NBA. If they are now required to play two years, then these kids are going to start going someplace that they will start for TWO years. Will the best PG in the nation come to UK next year if Teague is here? Nope! He's going where he will start NEXT year. So yes, this has a great affect on UK for the next two years IF, this rule is put in place.

To my knowledge, this has not been agreed upon by the Players Association. How much influence do agents have in the Players Association? Agents certainly won't be for this rule and they will do all they can to ensure it does not get passed.

It may hurt recruiting, but it will hurt ALL recruiting for everyone. The focus will turn to team-building with talent that has been recruited a little more. Teams like Gonzaga, UNLV, USC, etc... will start getting players again because people are going to want to play, just like you said.

HOWEVER, John Calipari's #2 strength behind recruiting is player development. Just look at examples. Patrick Patterson developed a face-up game. To anyone that has watched him at all in the NBA knows that is how he gets his points. He would still be in the D-League without it. Josh Harrelson, need I say more? DeMarcus Cousins have proved to be a head-case everywhere he has went, but for at least a moment, Cal got him to act somewhat-reasonable. DeAndre Liggins developed ANY semblance of an offensive game. When he first came to UK he had NOTHING but the drive. That is just the UK players, I am not even going as far back as Memphis or UMass. Players will still come to Cal because they KNOW that he KNOWS how to develop their games and get them ready for the next level. Maybe instead of full classes of John Wall's every year, maybe he has a John Wall or two and a few Kyle Wiltjer and Darius Miller's for a class. It would certainly work for me. I would take two 5 stars, a high 4 and a 3 if I KNEW I would have those two 5's for two years. Who wouldn't take a couple of Bobby Perry's if they knew they could have Cousins and Wall for two years? I would in a heart-beat.
Stardust Wrote:BUT!!!! Will the best players keep coming to UK? The best players want to PLAY. And that is what has made UK so attractive. The best recruiting classes for three straight years, hands down, has really been due to these kids coming with an expectation of playing their ONE year and then heading off to the NBA. If they are now required to play two years, then these kids are going to start going someplace that they will start for TWO years. Will the best PG in the nation come to UK next year if Teague is here? Nope! He's going where he will start NEXT year. So yes, this has a great affect on UK for the next two years IF, this rule is put in place.

To my knowledge, this has not been agreed upon by the Players Association. How much influence do agents have in the Players Association? Agents certainly won't be for this rule and they will do all they can to ensure it does not get passed.



some may come but most will probably go elsewhere.

I heard this couple nights ago during a college basketball game the announcers were talking about. They didn't say it was finished or anything but that was part of the deal, now whether or not that's in the deal that get's finalized I don't know just have to wait and see
It's about damn time.