11-12-2006, 07:15 PM
Lets say that OSU/Mich game is a close one. And since all the other teams are losing towards the end of the season should they play again in the BCS Championship?
-STAT- Wrote:No they shouldnt. Even if it's close, that wouldnt be fair to the other undefeated and 1loss teams that is in the hunt.
StrikeoutKing Wrote:Ohio State and Michigan are head and shoulders above everyone in college football this season, and coincidence they are in the same conference, and play each other in the regular season. If it is a close contest, I think the BCS will find a way to have the two meet again. Think about it...no other match-up would draw a higher TV audience, a higher profit, and what would be better than having the nation's top 2 teams square off again, except this time, on a neutral site! Personally, I don't think it should happen. Teams like USC, Florida, Arkansas, and Rutgers have earned their shot at a title. Although Florida and Arkansas have each have a loss, they play in the toughest football conference in the country. USC has proved itself lately after their loss to Oregon State. And Rutgers? WOW! If they win out, and look impressive against West Virginia, I say give it to 'em. I don't think another OSU/UM match-up should happen, but I think the BCS will find a way for it to happen, unless it is a 10+ victory margin. If I had the choice in determing the Title Game, I'd say the OSU/UM winner against the SEC Champion. But that's just me, and I don't think BCS really cares about hearing what people have to say.
StrikeoutKing Wrote:Ohio State and Michigan are head and shoulders above everyone in college football this season, and coincidence they are in the same conference, and play each other in the regular season. If it is a close contest, I think the BCS will find a way to have the two meet again. Think about it...no other match-up would draw a higher TV audience, a higher profit, and what would be better than having the nation's top 2 teams square off again, except this time, on a neutral site! Personally, I don't think it should happen. Teams like USC, Florida, Arkansas, and Rutgers have earned their shot at a title. Although Florida and Arkansas have each have a loss, they play in the toughest football conference in the country. USC has proved itself lately after their loss to Oregon State. And Rutgers? WOW! If they win out, and look impressive against West Virginia, I say give it to 'em. I don't think another OSU/UM match-up should happen, but I think the BCS will find a way for it to happen, unless it is a 10+ victory margin. If I had the choice in determing the Title Game, I'd say the OSU/UM winner against the SEC Champion. But that's just me, and I don't think BCS really cares about hearing what people have to say.
Beef Wrote:I think that it will be the winner of the OSU/Mich game v. the winner of the ND/USC game. But then again, what do I know?
-STAT- Wrote:Couldnt have said it any better, and I agree that the SEC Champion should be in the title game. Wins are hard to come by in the SEC, but teams like USC who is in the Pac-10, that conference isnt as loaded as the SEC so they have it pretty easy with the W's. Hopefully it is Florida and Ohio State, but like the BCS has proved before, it can screw teams over and anything can happen.I hope the same thing, -STAT-!!!!!:thumpsup:
Beef Wrote:I think that it will be the winner of the OSU/Mich game v. the winner of the ND/USC game. But then again, what do I know?
Camper Wrote:if an sec team comes out with one loss how this year how can they not be in the championship if one had come out undefeated it would be a lock thoughI couldn't have said iy better myself:Thumbs:
The Sec is the toughest conference and the winner of the championship deserves a title shot IMO